Treatment of arsenic-contaminated groundwater with a scrap iron-based electrocoagulation system: human health risk assessment and cost analysis

In this study, we investigated the impact of applied current, charge loading, initial pH, EC time, and packed-bed reactor density on total arsenic removal from groundwater (GW) in a scrap iron-based batch electrocoagulation (EC) process. The best operating conditions to achieve over 93% total arsenic removal for GW<sub>1</sub> and GW<sub>2</sub> were identified as follows: i = 50 mA, q = 1.25 C/L (7.77 F/m<sup>3</sup>), pH = 7.6, m<sub>b</sub> = 40 g Fe/L, and t<sub>EC</sub> = 10 min for GW<sub>1</sub>; and i = 100 mA, q = 5.0 C/L (3.1 F/m<sup>3</sup>), pH = 7.1, m<sub>b</sub> = 40 g Fe/L, and t<sub>EC</sub> = 25 min for GW<sub>2</sub>. GW treated with the EC process shows that arsenic does not pose a risk to humans and does not increase the likelihood of cancer, as demonstrated by chronic daily intake (CDI), hazard quotient (HQ), and carcinogenic risk (CR) analyses. The sludge produced after the EC process was examined using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), which revealed a dense and porous structure. Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis confirmed effective treatment, as evidenced by the accumulation of arsenic and iron. Furthermore, a comprehensive evaluation was conducted to assess the arsenic removal capacity, energy consumption, total operating costs, and kinetic analysis. The results show that the EC reactor using scrap iron is a reliable approach for treating GW contaminated with arsenic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Technology
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2025.2609984
Primary Topic
Advanced oxidation water treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment of arsenic-contaminated groundwater with a scrap iron-based electrocoagulation system: human health risk assessment and cost analysis

Mehmet Kobya, Nawid Ahmad Akhtar
Environmental Technology
Advanced oxidation water treatment
article

Treatment of arsenic-contaminated groundwater with a scrap iron-based electrocoagulation system: human health risk assessment and cost analysis

Mehmet Kobya, Nawid Ahmad Akhtar
article en

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the impact of applied current, charge loading, initial pH, EC time, and packed-bed reactor density on total arsenic removal from groundwater (GW) in a scrap iron-based batch electrocoagulation (EC) process. The best operating conditions to achieve over 93% total arsenic removal for GW<sub>1</sub> and GW<sub>2</sub> were identified as follows: i = 50 mA, q = 1.25 C/L (7.77 F/m<sup>3</sup>), pH = 7.6, m<sub>b</sub> = 40 g Fe/L, and t<sub>EC</sub> = 10 min for GW<sub>1</sub>; and i = 100 mA, q = 5.0 C/L (3.1 F/m<sup>3</sup>), pH = 7.1, m<sub>b</sub> = 40 g Fe/L, and t<sub>EC</sub> = 25 min for GW<sub>2</sub>. GW treated with the EC process shows that arsenic does not pose a risk to humans and does not increase the likelihood of cancer, as demonstrated by chronic daily intake (CDI), hazard quotient (HQ), and carcinogenic risk (CR) analyses. The sludge produced after the EC process was examined using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), which revealed a dense and porous structure. Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis confirmed effective treatment, as evidenced by the accumulation of arsenic and iron. Furthermore, a comprehensive evaluation was conducted to assess the arsenic removal capacity, energy consumption, total operating costs, and kinetic analysis. The results show that the EC reactor using scrap iron is a reliable approach for treating GW contaminated with arsenic.

Environmental TechnologyVol. 47(6)
Gebze Technical University (TR), Kyrgyz-Türkish Manas Üniversity (KG)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Advanced oxidation water treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Treatment of arsenic-contaminated groundwater with a scrap iron-based electrocoagulation system: human health risk assessment and cost analysis — Mehmet Kobya, Nawid Ahmad Akhtar · Environmental Technology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS