Why Feminist Participatory Methods Matter for Global Health Research in Sub‐Saharan Africa

Research in global health is often framed as centering health equity. However, research and programmatic partnerships are often relationships between institutions and researchers in high-income countries (HICs), and researchers and actors in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Such relationships are rife with power dynamics that require thoughtful attention and solutions. Feminist research methods, including perspectives from intersectional and African feminist thinkers, as well as participatory approaches, may offer a means of engaging with power inequities and disrupting often taken-for-granted assumptions in the SSA context. Such epistemological perspectives and methods not only disrupt "traditional" research relationships and challenge unexamined assumptions about knowledge but are also driven by the lived experiences of health disparities in specific, formerly colonized contexts and can therefore lead to context-specific or localized solutions to complex health inequities. This paper explores how these specific feminist research perspectives and methods can challenge power dynamics that are often embedded in global health research and interventions in SSA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Challenges
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202500066
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Feminist Participatory Methods Matter for Global Health Research in Sub‐Saharan Africa

Don Catherine Awuor Ochieng, Heather M. Tucker
Global Challenges
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Why Feminist Participatory Methods Matter for Global Health Research in Sub‐Saharan Africa

Don Catherine Awuor Ochieng, Heather M. Tucker
article en

Abstract

Research in global health is often framed as centering health equity. However, research and programmatic partnerships are often relationships between institutions and researchers in high-income countries (HICs), and researchers and actors in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Such relationships are rife with power dynamics that require thoughtful attention and solutions. Feminist research methods, including perspectives from intersectional and African feminist thinkers, as well as participatory approaches, may offer a means of engaging with power inequities and disrupting often taken-for-granted assumptions in the SSA context. Such epistemological perspectives and methods not only disrupt "traditional" research relationships and challenge unexamined assumptions about knowledge but are also driven by the lived experiences of health disparities in specific, formerly colonized contexts and can therefore lead to context-specific or localized solutions to complex health inequities. This paper explores how these specific feminist research perspectives and methods can challenge power dynamics that are often embedded in global health research and interventions in SSA.

Global ChallengesVol. 10(1)
San Francisco AIDS Foundation (US), Echo Network Africa (KE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.