Architecting ATA 28 with Model-Based Systems Engineering: Center of Gravity Balance and System Performance

<div>The fuel management system for a fixed-wing aircraft has been developed and explored with the model-based systems engineering (MBSE) methodology for maintaining the center of gravity (CoG) and analyzing flight safety. The system incorporates high-level modeling abstractions that exploit a mix of behaviors and physical detail resembling real-world components. This approach enables analysis for a multitude of system requirements, verification, and failure scenarios at high simulation speed, which is necessary during system definition. Initially, the CoG is maintained by directly accessing the flight deck valves and pumps in both wings and controlling them through the bang-bang control law. In the refinement phase of the fuel system controller, the manual and individual controls of the valves and pumps are replaced with an autonomous fuel transfer scheme. The autonomous scheme achieves no more than a 20 kg difference in fuel between the wings during normal conditions. In the event of failures, the controller achieves no more than a 100 kg difference in fuel between the wings. The difference returns to 20 kg within a settling time of 5 sec and a maximum allowable overshoot safety margin of 10% of the 20 kg difference in normal conditions (±2 kg). The specification 20 kg/5 sec band varies with pump and valve parameters. Although this specification is sufficient for a system-level model, it can be refined with pump and valve parameters and nonlinear effects in the network. The system identification method is also trialed to control an individual engine by estimating a proportional integrator derivative (PID) controller of the engine plant. The safety tests are initiated in a user interface enabling error detection and injection. The fuel system model is used for analyzing refueling, defueling, and jettison scenarios with appropriate flow rates.</div> <div>Besides the CoG maintenance, several aspects of configurations of the system’s functional and logical architecture, considering increasing component redundancy and activities for MBSE framework, have been conducted. The logical and temporal verification of system requirements is performed in simulation. To ensure traceability and coverage, the requirements and the associated verification artifacts are digitally linked to the implementing blocks. Test scenarios are implemented for investigating resultant and emergent behaviors at various levels of system hierarchy by isolating either the subsystem or the components that have been performed. To further check out the MBSE workflow, the fuel system controller code has been directly emitted from the controller model for DO-178C objectives. At the mission-level validation, a jettison scenario is developed for a mission and flight plan in the digital mission engineering and systems analysis environment of Systems Tool Kit (STK) Aviator. The aircraft fuel system configuration is set using the fuel system model.</div> <div>The power of MBSE methodology supported by a modeling and simulation framework provides plenty of opportunities for through-life analysis in the early design lifecycle phase.</div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE International Journal of Aerospace
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/01-18-03-0015
Primary Topic
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Architecting ATA 28 with Model-Based Systems Engineering: Center of Gravity Balance and System Performance

Ota Michalek, Yaseen Zaidi
SAE International Journal of Aerospace
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
article

Architecting ATA 28 with Model-Based Systems Engineering: Center of Gravity Balance and System Performance

Ota Michalek, Yaseen Zaidi
article en

Abstract

<div>The fuel management system for a fixed-wing aircraft has been developed and explored with the model-based systems engineering (MBSE) methodology for maintaining the center of gravity (CoG) and analyzing flight safety. The system incorporates high-level modeling abstractions that exploit a mix of behaviors and physical detail resembling real-world components. This approach enables analysis for a multitude of system requirements, verification, and failure scenarios at high simulation speed, which is necessary during system definition. Initially, the CoG is maintained by directly accessing the flight deck valves and pumps in both wings and controlling them through the bang-bang control law. In the refinement phase of the fuel system controller, the manual and individual controls of the valves and pumps are replaced with an autonomous fuel transfer scheme. The autonomous scheme achieves no more than a 20 kg difference in fuel between the wings during normal conditions. In the event of failures, the controller achieves no more than a 100 kg difference in fuel between the wings. The difference returns to 20 kg within a settling time of 5 sec and a maximum allowable overshoot safety margin of 10% of the 20 kg difference in normal conditions (±2 kg). The specification 20 kg/5 sec band varies with pump and valve parameters. Although this specification is sufficient for a system-level model, it can be refined with pump and valve parameters and nonlinear effects in the network. The system identification method is also trialed to control an individual engine by estimating a proportional integrator derivative (PID) controller of the engine plant. The safety tests are initiated in a user interface enabling error detection and injection. The fuel system model is used for analyzing refueling, defueling, and jettison scenarios with appropriate flow rates.</div> <div>Besides the CoG maintenance, several aspects of configurations of the system’s functional and logical architecture, considering increasing component redundancy and activities for MBSE framework, have been conducted. The logical and temporal verification of system requirements is performed in simulation. To ensure traceability and coverage, the requirements and the associated verification artifacts are digitally linked to the implementing blocks. Test scenarios are implemented for investigating resultant and emergent behaviors at various levels of system hierarchy by isolating either the subsystem or the components that have been performed. To further check out the MBSE workflow, the fuel system controller code has been directly emitted from the controller model for DO-178C objectives. At the mission-level validation, a jettison scenario is developed for a mission and flight plan in the digital mission engineering and systems analysis environment of Systems Tool Kit (STK) Aviator. The aircraft fuel system configuration is set using the fuel system model.</div> <div>The power of MBSE methodology supported by a modeling and simulation framework provides plenty of opportunities for through-life analysis in the early design lifecycle phase.</div>

SAE International Journal of AerospaceVol. 18(3)
University of the West of England (GB), Cranfield University (GB), Defence Academy of the United Kingdom (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.