Supporting meaningful engagement and implementation of questionnaire metadata – Progress from the DDI Q² Working Group

The DDI standard provides a structured framework for documenting questions and questionnaires, enabling users to identify exactly what was asked of respondents to generate the data (i.e. the provenance of variables). The DDI Questions and Questionnaires (Q2) Working Group comprises 15 members representing the international DDI community. Its aim is to provide guidance for creating and meaningfully engaging with question and questionnaire metadata. To achieve this, three subgroups have been established: Guides and Best Practices, Tools, and Real Life Examples. The Guides and Best Practices subgroup is developing practical guidance that extends on existing learning materials to support meaningful engagement with and implementation of DDI question and questionnaire metadata. The Tools subgroup is collating and evaluating questionnaire design and documentation tools and their interoperability with DDI, to help users choose the tool that best meets their needs. The Real Life Examples subgroup is gathering exemplary documentation to be included in the practical guidance. This presentation will provide an overview of the Q2 Working Group’s aims, progress, and future plans. We also welcome feedback from the DDI community to ensure our work reflects and supports user needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18184136
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting meaningful engagement and implementation of questionnaire metadata – Progress from the DDI Q² Working Group

Lucie Marie, Romain Tailhurat, Rebecca Oldroyd
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Research Data Management Practices
article

Supporting meaningful engagement and implementation of questionnaire metadata – Progress from the DDI Q² Working Group

Lucie Marie, Romain Tailhurat, Rebecca Oldroyd
article en

Abstract

The DDI standard provides a structured framework for documenting questions and questionnaires, enabling users to identify exactly what was asked of respondents to generate the data (i.e. the provenance of variables). The DDI Questions and Questionnaires (Q2) Working Group comprises 15 members representing the international DDI community. Its aim is to provide guidance for creating and meaningfully engaging with question and questionnaire metadata. To achieve this, three subgroups have been established: Guides and Best Practices, Tools, and Real Life Examples. The Guides and Best Practices subgroup is developing practical guidance that extends on existing learning materials to support meaningful engagement with and implementation of DDI question and questionnaire metadata. The Tools subgroup is collating and evaluating questionnaire design and documentation tools and their interoperability with DDI, to help users choose the tool that best meets their needs. The Real Life Examples subgroup is gathering exemplary documentation to be included in the practical guidance. This presentation will provide an overview of the Q2 Working Group’s aims, progress, and future plans. We also welcome feedback from the DDI community to ensure our work reflects and supports user needs.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (FR), Flanders Make (Belgium) (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.