Early Disclosure of Blood‐Based Biomarkers Optimizes Alzheimer's Disease Management and Treatment Initiation: the PLASMAR study

Abstract Background Blood‐based biomarkers (BBMs) offer a cost‐effective, non‐invasive approach for detecting Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology, but their impact on improving diagnostic certainty and patient management remains unclear. The PLASMAR study is a prospective, single‐center, blinded, randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of early versus delayed BBM adoption on clinical practice in a public hospital memory clinic. This abstract presents an interim analysis on changes in patient management. Method From February to October 2024, 224 patients with cognitive or behavioral complaints (GDS 2–4) referred to the memory clinic at Hospital del Mar (Barcelona, Spain) were prospectively enrolled. Eligibility criteria are detailed in Table 1. At baseline, blood samples were collected for BBMs, and neurologists assessed diagnostic confidence based on routine clinical evaluation without BBM results. Participants were randomized to the Early (BBM results disclosed at 3 months) or Late (disclosed at 9 months) arms. Patient management changes were compared between arms. Plasma p ‐tau217 levels, classified by validated cutoffs, stratified patients into low, intermediate, or high risk for AD pathology. Result Of 224 enrolled patients, 27 were lost to follow‐up, leaving 197 participants (mean age 71.6 ± 8.9 years; 56.9% female). There were no demographic differences between study arms. Initial diagnoses included SCD (44.7%), MCI (31.4%), or dementia (21.3%), with AD suspected in 30%. By December 2024, 114 patients (87 Early, 27 Late) had BBM results disclosed. AD risk was classified as low (52.4%), intermediate (17.5%), or high (30%). At 3‐months follow‐up, Early‐arm patients had higher discharge rates and initiated AchEIs sooner ( p <0.01), while Late‐arm patients more frequently received longitudinal cognitive monitoring ( p <0.01). Among SCD patients, Early‐arm participants had higher discharge rates and underwent more lumbar punctures for CSF biomarkers according to their AD pathology risk ( p <0.05), while Late‐arm patients were more likely to undergo cognitive monitoring ( p <0.001). Among MCI patients, Early‐arm participants had higher discharge rates ( p <0.01). Similar trends were observed in the low‐risk AD group ( p <0.05). Conclusion This interim analysis demonstrates that early disclosure of BBM results influences patient management and accelerates the initiation of specific AD treatments, also reducing the need for follow‐up of cognitive assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_106918
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Disclosure of Blood‐Based Biomarkers Optimizes Alzheimer's Disease Management and Treatment Initiation: the PLASMAR study

Gianmarco Iaccarino, Paula Ortiz‐Romero, Irene Navalpotro‐Gómez, Rosa María Manero-Borràs et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Early Disclosure of Blood‐Based Biomarkers Optimizes Alzheimer's Disease Management and Treatment Initiation: the PLASMAR study

Gianmarco Iaccarino, Paula Ortiz‐Romero, Irene Navalpotro‐Gómez, Rosa María Manero-Borràs, Juan José Hernández Sánchez, Helena Blasco‐Forniés, Oriol Grau‐Rivera, Marta del Campo, Albert Puig‐Pijoan, Marina De Diego‐Osaba, José Contador, Javier Torres‐Torronteras, Isabel Estragués‐Gázquez, Esther Jiménez‐Moyano, Leidy Dayana Martinez, Marc Suarez‐Calvet, Greta Garcia‐Escobar, Aida Fernández‐Lebrero, Anna Padrós
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Blood‐based biomarkers (BBMs) offer a cost‐effective, non‐invasive approach for detecting Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology, but their impact on improving diagnostic certainty and patient management remains unclear. The PLASMAR study is a prospective, single‐center, blinded, randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of early versus delayed BBM adoption on clinical practice in a public hospital memory clinic. This abstract presents an interim analysis on changes in patient management. Method From February to October 2024, 224 patients with cognitive or behavioral complaints (GDS 2–4) referred to the memory clinic at Hospital del Mar (Barcelona, Spain) were prospectively enrolled. Eligibility criteria are detailed in Table 1. At baseline, blood samples were collected for BBMs, and neurologists assessed diagnostic confidence based on routine clinical evaluation without BBM results. Participants were randomized to the Early (BBM results disclosed at 3 months) or Late (disclosed at 9 months) arms. Patient management changes were compared between arms. Plasma p ‐tau217 levels, classified by validated cutoffs, stratified patients into low, intermediate, or high risk for AD pathology. Result Of 224 enrolled patients, 27 were lost to follow‐up, leaving 197 participants (mean age 71.6 ± 8.9 years; 56.9% female). There were no demographic differences between study arms. Initial diagnoses included SCD (44.7%), MCI (31.4%), or dementia (21.3%), with AD suspected in 30%. By December 2024, 114 patients (87 Early, 27 Late) had BBM results disclosed. AD risk was classified as low (52.4%), intermediate (17.5%), or high (30%). At 3‐months follow‐up, Early‐arm patients had higher discharge rates and initiated AchEIs sooner ( p <0.01), while Late‐arm patients more frequently received longitudinal cognitive monitoring ( p <0.01). Among SCD patients, Early‐arm participants had higher discharge rates and underwent more lumbar punctures for CSF biomarkers according to their AD pathology risk ( p <0.05), while Late‐arm patients were more likely to undergo cognitive monitoring ( p <0.001). Among MCI patients, Early‐arm participants had higher discharge rates ( p <0.01). Similar trends were observed in the low‐risk AD group ( p <0.05). Conclusion This interim analysis demonstrates that early disclosure of BBM results influences patient management and accelerates the initiation of specific AD treatments, also reducing the need for follow‐up of cognitive assessments.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Universidad San Pablo CEU (ES), Generalitat de Catalunya (ES), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (ES), Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (ES), Hospital Del Mar (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (ES), Hospital del Mar Research Institute (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.