Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: A randomized phase Ⅱa trial

To preliminarily evaluate the efficacy, safety and continuous infusion dose of remimazolam besylate in short-term mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units. This randomized phase Ⅱa trial was conducted in intensive care units (ICUs) in six hospitals in China. Adults that were anticipated to receive mechanical ventilation for ≥6 h and to have a Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale (RASS) scores of -2 to +1 were enrolled in the trial and randomized (1:1:1) into three groups to receive 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg/(kg•h) remimazolam besylate. The primary outcome was the percentage of time with the target RASS scores without rescue sedation. The secondary endpoint was adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The optimal continuous infusion dose was also explored. The percentage of time with the target RASS scores without rescue sedation did not differ among the groups (97.5±6.0 in the 0.1 mg/(kg•h) group with 11 participants, 95.2±8.0 in the 0.2 mg/(kg•h) group with 12 participants, and 97.0±2.4 in the 0.4 mg/(kg•h) group with 11 participants; P =0.665). The numbers of patients with ADRs were 7 (63.6%), 4 (33.3%), and 6 (54.5%) in the 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg/(kg•h) groups, respectively ( P =0.326). No participants experienced severe ADRs, and only 1 (9.1%) in the 0.4 mg/(kg•h) group experienced a grade 3–5 ADR. The optimal continuous infusion dose was 0.2–0.3 mg/(kg•h). Remimazolam besylate seems efficacious and safe in patients receiving short-term mechanical ventilation and light sedation, which justifies further trials. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT06124404.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intensive Medicine
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2025.12.002
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: A randomized phase Ⅱa trial

Renhua Sun, Xueping Yang, Yu Li, Dezhong Li et al.
Journal of Intensive Medicine
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: A randomized phase Ⅱa trial

Renhua Sun, Xueping Yang, Yu Li, Dezhong Li, You Shang, Xiang Zhou, Fengming Liang, Shouzhi Fu, Xinting Yu, Luanyuan Tian
article en

Abstract

To preliminarily evaluate the efficacy, safety and continuous infusion dose of remimazolam besylate in short-term mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units. This randomized phase Ⅱa trial was conducted in intensive care units (ICUs) in six hospitals in China. Adults that were anticipated to receive mechanical ventilation for ≥6 h and to have a Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale (RASS) scores of -2 to +1 were enrolled in the trial and randomized (1:1:1) into three groups to receive 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg/(kg•h) remimazolam besylate. The primary outcome was the percentage of time with the target RASS scores without rescue sedation. The secondary endpoint was adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The optimal continuous infusion dose was also explored. The percentage of time with the target RASS scores without rescue sedation did not differ among the groups (97.5±6.0 in the 0.1 mg/(kg•h) group with 11 participants, 95.2±8.0 in the 0.2 mg/(kg•h) group with 12 participants, and 97.0±2.4 in the 0.4 mg/(kg•h) group with 11 participants; P =0.665). The numbers of patients with ADRs were 7 (63.6%), 4 (33.3%), and 6 (54.5%) in the 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg/(kg•h) groups, respectively ( P =0.326). No participants experienced severe ADRs, and only 1 (9.1%) in the 0.4 mg/(kg•h) group experienced a grade 3–5 ADR. The optimal continuous infusion dose was 0.2–0.3 mg/(kg•h). Remimazolam besylate seems efficacious and safe in patients receiving short-term mechanical ventilation and light sedation, which justifies further trials. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT06124404.

Journal of Intensive Medicine
Union Hospital (HK), Humanwell Healthcare Group (China) (CN), The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture (CN), Zhejiang Hospital (CN), Wuhan Third Hospital (CN), Central Hospital of Wuhan (CN), Wuxi People's Hospital (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.