Rethinking racism again? Assessing conceptual deadlocks and innovations in race theory

Through focusing on racial formation theory, systemic racism theory, and the racialized social systems approach, I argue that sociological race theories often reproduce methodological nationalism, stage-ism, and groupism. Such conceptual approaches often equate the boundaries of racial structures with the geographical borders of nation-states, racial categories are often presented as groups with cohesive racial interests, and there is a methodological proclivity to think in terms of distinct “periods” of racialization in a way that occludes moments of continuity. By contrast, I propose that race theorists ought to focus on transboundary entanglements, slow burning raciality, and dynamic racialization. Taking these concepts together, I specify that race theorists ought to develop understandings of how even hyper-localized conditions of race and racialization may be facilitated by transnational relations; that we ought to consider the continuity of racial domination over the long durée; and that we ought to think about racialization as a dynamic process, bringing more specificity to the notion of racial interests to think of specific moments in which different social fractions (e.g. white elites and white workers) synergize their differing interests to maintain racial domination.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.124561
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking racism again? Assessing conceptual deadlocks and innovations in race theory

Ali Meghji
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Rethinking racism again? Assessing conceptual deadlocks and innovations in race theory

Ali Meghji
article en

Abstract

Through focusing on racial formation theory, systemic racism theory, and the racialized social systems approach, I argue that sociological race theories often reproduce methodological nationalism, stage-ism, and groupism. Such conceptual approaches often equate the boundaries of racial structures with the geographical borders of nation-states, racial categories are often presented as groups with cohesive racial interests, and there is a methodological proclivity to think in terms of distinct “periods” of racialization in a way that occludes moments of continuity. By contrast, I propose that race theorists ought to focus on transboundary entanglements, slow burning raciality, and dynamic racialization. Taking these concepts together, I specify that race theorists ought to develop understandings of how even hyper-localized conditions of race and racialization may be facilitated by transnational relations; that we ought to consider the continuity of racial domination over the long durée; and that we ought to think about racialization as a dynamic process, bringing more specificity to the notion of racial interests to think of specific moments in which different social fractions (e.g. white elites and white workers) synergize their differing interests to maintain racial domination.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.