A Comparative Review of the Experimental Mitigation Methods of the S-Shaped Diffusers in the Aeroengine Intakes

Gas Turbines are among the most important energy systems for aviation and thermal-based power generation. The performance of gas turbine intakes with S-shaped diffusers is vulnerable to flow separation, reversal flow, and pressure distortion, mainly in aggressive S-shaped diffusers. Several methods, including vortex generators and energy promoters, have been proposed and investigated both experimentally and numerically. This paper compiles a review of experimental investigations that have been performed and reported to mitigate flow separation and restore system performance. The operational principles, classifications, design geometries, and performance parameters of S-shaped diffusers are presented to facilitate the analysis and understanding of the influence of each mitigation method on flow enhancement in S-shaped diffusers. The influencing design parameters on the performance of the S-shaped diffuser and the findings achieved by various experimental investigations are discussed and compared. The review concludes that reducing the intake length reduces the size and weight of the gas turbine, leading to a higher power-to-weight ratio. However, the main challenge in shortening the S-shaped diffusers is the flow separation in the high-curvature section, which must be prevented to maintain high performance. Prevention can be achieved through flow control methods, which are categorized into passive and aggressive methods. The static pressure recovery coefficient, total pressure loss coefficient, ideal static pressure coefficient, distortion coefficient, and skin friction coefficient are the primary performance evaluation and comparison parameters between the experimentally investigated mitigation methods. The new trend in S-shaped diffuser studies includes the integration of computational and data-driven methods.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Engineering
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32604/ee.2025.073303
Primary Topic
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Review of the Experimental Mitigation Methods of the S-Shaped Diffusers in the Aeroengine Intakes

Hussain H. Al‐Kayiem, Raed A. Jessam, Sundus S. Al-Azawiey, Safaa M. Ali
Energy Engineering
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
article

A Comparative Review of the Experimental Mitigation Methods of the S-Shaped Diffusers in the Aeroengine Intakes

Hussain H. Al‐Kayiem, Raed A. Jessam, Sundus S. Al-Azawiey, Safaa M. Ali
article en

Abstract

Gas Turbines are among the most important energy systems for aviation and thermal-based power generation. The performance of gas turbine intakes with S-shaped diffusers is vulnerable to flow separation, reversal flow, and pressure distortion, mainly in aggressive S-shaped diffusers. Several methods, including vortex generators and energy promoters, have been proposed and investigated both experimentally and numerically. This paper compiles a review of experimental investigations that have been performed and reported to mitigate flow separation and restore system performance. The operational principles, classifications, design geometries, and performance parameters of S-shaped diffusers are presented to facilitate the analysis and understanding of the influence of each mitigation method on flow enhancement in S-shaped diffusers. The influencing design parameters on the performance of the S-shaped diffuser and the findings achieved by various experimental investigations are discussed and compared. The review concludes that reducing the intake length reduces the size and weight of the gas turbine, leading to a higher power-to-weight ratio. However, the main challenge in shortening the S-shaped diffusers is the flow separation in the high-curvature section, which must be prevented to maintain high performance. Prevention can be achieved through flow control methods, which are categorized into passive and aggressive methods. The static pressure recovery coefficient, total pressure loss coefficient, ideal static pressure coefficient, distortion coefficient, and skin friction coefficient are the primary performance evaluation and comparison parameters between the experimentally investigated mitigation methods. The new trend in S-shaped diffuser studies includes the integration of computational and data-driven methods.

Energy EngineeringVol. 123(2)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.