Spectrum of blood viscosity, albumin/fibrinogen ratio, and red cell distribution width in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: an observational study

Background and aims Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell disorder characterized by clonal proliferation within the bone marrow, leading to bone destruction, anemia, renal failure, and immune dysfunction. The albumin/fibrinogen ratio (AFR), red cell distribution width (RDW), and calculated whole blood viscosity (cWBV) have emerged as potential prognostic markers reflecting inflammation, nutritional status, and hemorheological properties. However, literature reports remain inconsistent, and their prognostic significance in newly diagnosed patients has not been clearly defined. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of AFR, RDW, and cWBV in predicting overall survival in newly diagnosed MM patients using readily available laboratory indices. Patients and methods This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted at the Hematology Unit, Assiut University Hospital, from April 2023 to April 2025. A total of 48 patients with newly diagnosed MM, defined according to International Myeloma Working Group 2016 criteria, were enrolled. Clinical data, complete blood count, serum albumin, fibrinogen, and total protein were obtained at diagnosis. AFR and cWBV were computed using validated formulas. RDW was derived from the automated blood count. Survival analysis used Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess predictors of overall survival. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to determine diagnostic performance and optimal cutoff values. Correlations with the percentage of plasma cells in the bone marrow, renal insufficiency, and lytic lesions were evaluated. Results Elevated RDW and decreased AFR values were significantly associated with poor survival. AFR was 9.3 ± 2.4 among survivors versus 6.7 ± 1.7 in nonsurvivors ( P <0.001). Median RDW was 15.6 versus 17.9% ( P =0.008). No significant difference in cWBV was observed ( P =0.203). Kaplan–Meier showed significant associations for AFR ( P =0.012) and RDW ( P =0.039), but not cWBV ( P =0.170). AFR had the highest prognostic accuracy compared with RDW. Multivariate Cox regression confirmed RDW as an independent predictor ( P =0.003), whereas AFR approached significance ( P =0.056). Conclusion AFR and RDW are simple and readily available prognostic markers, while cWBV was not predictive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Haematology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ejh.ejh_134_25
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spectrum of blood viscosity, albumin/fibrinogen ratio, and red cell distribution width in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: an observational study

Ahmed Radwan Abdel-hakim Rostom, Maiada Kamal, Muhamad R. Abdel Hameed
The Egyptian Journal of Haematology
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

Spectrum of blood viscosity, albumin/fibrinogen ratio, and red cell distribution width in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: an observational study

Ahmed Radwan Abdel-hakim Rostom, Maiada Kamal, Muhamad R. Abdel Hameed
article en

Abstract

Background and aims Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell disorder characterized by clonal proliferation within the bone marrow, leading to bone destruction, anemia, renal failure, and immune dysfunction. The albumin/fibrinogen ratio (AFR), red cell distribution width (RDW), and calculated whole blood viscosity (cWBV) have emerged as potential prognostic markers reflecting inflammation, nutritional status, and hemorheological properties. However, literature reports remain inconsistent, and their prognostic significance in newly diagnosed patients has not been clearly defined. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of AFR, RDW, and cWBV in predicting overall survival in newly diagnosed MM patients using readily available laboratory indices. Patients and methods This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted at the Hematology Unit, Assiut University Hospital, from April 2023 to April 2025. A total of 48 patients with newly diagnosed MM, defined according to International Myeloma Working Group 2016 criteria, were enrolled. Clinical data, complete blood count, serum albumin, fibrinogen, and total protein were obtained at diagnosis. AFR and cWBV were computed using validated formulas. RDW was derived from the automated blood count. Survival analysis used Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess predictors of overall survival. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to determine diagnostic performance and optimal cutoff values. Correlations with the percentage of plasma cells in the bone marrow, renal insufficiency, and lytic lesions were evaluated. Results Elevated RDW and decreased AFR values were significantly associated with poor survival. AFR was 9.3 ± 2.4 among survivors versus 6.7 ± 1.7 in nonsurvivors ( P <0.001). Median RDW was 15.6 versus 17.9% ( P =0.008). No significant difference in cWBV was observed ( P =0.203). Kaplan–Meier showed significant associations for AFR ( P =0.012) and RDW ( P =0.039), but not cWBV ( P =0.170). AFR had the highest prognostic accuracy compared with RDW. Multivariate Cox regression confirmed RDW as an independent predictor ( P =0.003), whereas AFR approached significance ( P =0.056). Conclusion AFR and RDW are simple and readily available prognostic markers, while cWBV was not predictive.

The Egyptian Journal of HaematologyVol. 50(4)
Assiut University Hospitals (EG), Assiut University (EG)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.