Cycles of supersingular elliptic curves for pairing-based proof systems

We give new constructions of cycles of pairing-friendly elliptic curves with a view towards unbounded recursive pairing-based proof systems. Unlike the only known prior cycle of elliptic curves - the ordinary MNT cycle - our construction uses elliptic curves that are supersingular. The drawback of our approach is that the supersingular cycles are defined over extension fields (quadratic extensions in the optimal case), which makes elements and computations in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>𝔾</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> less compact and efficient than those in the MNT cycle. On the other hand, the supersingular cycles in this paper offer a key advantage over their MNT counterpart: every instance of our infinite family of supersingular curves can be efficiently constructed via Bröker's algorithm, whereas it is only feasible to construct a relatively small, bounded number of MNT instances via the CM method. In other words, while both constructions give infinite families of pairing-friendly curves in theory, only the supersingular construction gives rise to infinite numbers of cycles that can be realised in practice. Supersingular cycles offer benefits that are relevant in the context of recursive pairing-based proof systems. They afford flexibility in the choices of underlying finite fields; one can choose primes <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for which the underlying field arithmetic is efficient and for which <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> is divisible by a large power of 2. Or, as we study in detail, using supersingular cycles unlocks the possibility of connecting the cycle with other pairing-friendly elliptic curves that are defined over much smaller finite fields, where proof system arithmetic is much more efficient. Indeed, constructing these so-called lollipops of pairing-friendly curves was the motivating problem (posed by researchers back in 2019) that inspired the present work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IACR Communications in Cryptology
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62056/ahmpdk5vt
Primary Topic
Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cycles of supersingular elliptic curves for pairing-based proof systems

Craig Costello, Gaurish Korpal
IACR Communications in Cryptology
Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
article

Cycles of supersingular elliptic curves for pairing-based proof systems

Craig Costello, Gaurish Korpal
article en

Abstract

We give new constructions of cycles of pairing-friendly elliptic curves with a view towards unbounded recursive pairing-based proof systems. Unlike the only known prior cycle of elliptic curves - the ordinary MNT cycle - our construction uses elliptic curves that are supersingular. The drawback of our approach is that the supersingular cycles are defined over extension fields (quadratic extensions in the optimal case), which makes elements and computations in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>𝔾</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> less compact and efficient than those in the MNT cycle. On the other hand, the supersingular cycles in this paper offer a key advantage over their MNT counterpart: every instance of our infinite family of supersingular curves can be efficiently constructed via Bröker's algorithm, whereas it is only feasible to construct a relatively small, bounded number of MNT instances via the CM method. In other words, while both constructions give infinite families of pairing-friendly curves in theory, only the supersingular construction gives rise to infinite numbers of cycles that can be realised in practice. Supersingular cycles offer benefits that are relevant in the context of recursive pairing-based proof systems. They afford flexibility in the choices of underlying finite fields; one can choose primes <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for which the underlying field arithmetic is efficient and for which <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> is divisible by a large power of 2. Or, as we study in detail, using supersingular cycles unlocks the possibility of connecting the cycle with other pairing-friendly elliptic curves that are defined over much smaller finite fields, where proof system arithmetic is much more efficient. Indeed, constructing these so-called lollipops of pairing-friendly curves was the motivating problem (posed by researchers back in 2019) that inspired the present work.

IACR Communications in CryptologyVol. 2(4)
University of Arizona (US), Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.