Structural complexity across a continuum of woodland establishment methods from planting to natural colonisation

Expanding forest and woodland cover is a global strategy to mitigate and adapt to the climate crisis and reverse biodiversity decline. While most woodland in temperate regions is created through tree planting, natural colonisation has been advocated for as an alternative or complementary approach. However, there is limited understanding on how the structural attributes of woodlands created through these different approaches develop through time. To address this knowledge gap, we assessed a suite of structural metrics for 28 woodland sites (aged 13–43 years) that were established along a planted to natural colonisation continuum in England. We used an Uncrewed Aerial System to collect LiDAR data alongside field surveys and calculated metrics relating to above-ground biomass accumulation (canopy height and basal area) and metrics relating to structural complexity (the horizontal and vertical arrangement of canopy) as a proxy for biodiversity potential. Canopy height and basal area were higher in woodlands with larger proportions of planting. Additionally, woodlands with higher proportions of planting displayed greater vertical complexity (canopy stratification) whereas there was weak evidence that woodlands with higher proportions of natural colonisation develop greater horizontal complexity (gap fraction). This suggests that tree planting is the better option when biomass accumulation is the primary goal, whereas natural colonisation or hybrid approaches are likely to be beneficial when the focus is biodiversity or a mix of outcomes. Woodlands created through hybrid approaches that combine planting and natural colonisation offered intermediate values of biomass accumulation and structural complexity. • Woodland creation varies continuously between natural colonisation and planting. • LiDAR can quantify structural outcomes of different woodland creation strategies. • Planted woodlands accumulate basal area more quickly than naturally colonised woodlands. • Naturally colonised woodlands may accumulate horizontal complexity more quickly. • Hybrid approaches mixing planting and natural colonisation may offer dual benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Ecology and Management
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123490
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural complexity across a continuum of woodland establishment methods from planting to natural colonisation

Kirsty Park, Marc J. Metzger, Julia Koricheva, Samuel Hughes et al.
Forest Ecology and Management
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

Structural complexity across a continuum of woodland establishment methods from planting to natural colonisation

Kirsty Park, Marc J. Metzger, Julia Koricheva, Samuel Hughes, Watts Kevin, Thiago S.F. Silva, Matt Guy, Elisa Fuentes-Montemayor, Vanessa Burton
article en

Abstract

Expanding forest and woodland cover is a global strategy to mitigate and adapt to the climate crisis and reverse biodiversity decline. While most woodland in temperate regions is created through tree planting, natural colonisation has been advocated for as an alternative or complementary approach. However, there is limited understanding on how the structural attributes of woodlands created through these different approaches develop through time. To address this knowledge gap, we assessed a suite of structural metrics for 28 woodland sites (aged 13–43 years) that were established along a planted to natural colonisation continuum in England. We used an Uncrewed Aerial System to collect LiDAR data alongside field surveys and calculated metrics relating to above-ground biomass accumulation (canopy height and basal area) and metrics relating to structural complexity (the horizontal and vertical arrangement of canopy) as a proxy for biodiversity potential. Canopy height and basal area were higher in woodlands with larger proportions of planting. Additionally, woodlands with higher proportions of planting displayed greater vertical complexity (canopy stratification) whereas there was weak evidence that woodlands with higher proportions of natural colonisation develop greater horizontal complexity (gap fraction). This suggests that tree planting is the better option when biomass accumulation is the primary goal, whereas natural colonisation or hybrid approaches are likely to be beneficial when the focus is biodiversity or a mix of outcomes. Woodlands created through hybrid approaches that combine planting and natural colonisation offered intermediate values of biomass accumulation and structural complexity. • Woodland creation varies continuously between natural colonisation and planting. • LiDAR can quantify structural outcomes of different woodland creation strategies. • Planted woodlands accumulate basal area more quickly than naturally colonised woodlands. • Naturally colonised woodlands may accumulate horizontal complexity more quickly. • Hybrid approaches mixing planting and natural colonisation may offer dual benefits.

Forest Ecology and ManagementVol. 605
University of Stirling (GB), Royal Holloway University of London (GB), Forest Research (GB), Woodland Trust (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.