Classification performance of the Lumipulse <sup>®</sup> G pTau 217 Plasma assay and Lumipulse <sup>®</sup> G pTau 217/β‐Amyloid 1‐42 Plasma Ratio in a preclinical cohort

Abstract Background The Lumipulse ® G pTau217 assay is among the highest performing plasma assays available for detecting amyloid pathology. Recently, Fujirebio has submitted the Lumipulse ® G pTau 217/β‐Amyloid 1‐42 Plasma Ratio to the FDA. The aim of the current study was to assess the utility of these assays for classifying amyloid and tau PET status in a risk‐enriched preclinical Alzheimer's disease cohort. Method 190 plasma samples from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention and the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center were selected and analyzed using the Lumipulse ® G pTau 217 Plasma assay. Another set of 451 plasma samples were selected and analyzed using the Lumipulse ® G pTau 217/β‐Amyloid 1‐42 Plasma Ratio. 38 samples were analyzed using both assays. Amyloid and tau positivity were determined based on visual reads of [C‐11]PiB and [F‐18]Florquinitau PET scans, respectively. We used ROC analyses to assess the amyloid and tau classification performance of the biomarkers. We used Spearman correlations to compare plasma pTau217 levels in the samples that were analyzed using both assays. All analyses were cross‐sectional and the maximum time difference between plasma and PET assessment was two years. Result Sample characteristics for both the Lumipulse ® G pTau 217 and Lumipulse ® G pTau 217/β‐Amyloid 1‐42 Plasma Ratio data subsets are provided in Table 1. The ROC AUC of pTau217 was .93 for amyloid PET (95% CI .89‐.98, accuracy 86%) and .93 for tau PET (95% CI .87‐.99, accuracy 88%; Figure 1). The ROC AUC of the pTau217/Abeta 42 ratio was .93 for amyloid PET (95% CI .89 ‐ .97, accuracy 90%) and .90 for tau PET (95% CI .83‐.96, accuracy 68%; Figure 2). The Spearman correlation between plasma pTau217 levels was .92. Conclusion Both the Lumipulse ® G pTau 217 Plasma assay and the Lumipulse ® G pTau 217/β‐Amyloid 1‐42 Plasma Ratio accurately classified amyloid and tau status in this largely cognitively unimpaired, preclinical cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_105672
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification performance of the Lumipulse ® G pTau 217 Plasma assay and Lumipulse ® G pTau 217/β‐Amyloid 1‐42 Plasma Ratio in a preclinical cohort

Martie Marshall, Rachael E. Wilson, Julie Elisabeth Oomens, Ramiro Eduardo Rea Reyes et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
article

Classification performance of the Lumipulse ® G pTau 217 Plasma assay and Lumipulse ® G pTau 217/β‐Amyloid 1‐42 Plasma Ratio in a preclinical cohort

Martie Marshall, Rachael E. Wilson, Julie Elisabeth Oomens, Ramiro Eduardo Rea Reyes, Sanjay Asthana, Nathaniel Chin, Henrik Zetterberg, Sterling C Johnson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Lumipulse ® G pTau217 assay is among the highest performing plasma assays available for detecting amyloid pathology. Recently, Fujirebio has submitted the Lumipulse ® G pTau 217/β‐Amyloid 1‐42 Plasma Ratio to the FDA. The aim of the current study was to assess the utility of these assays for classifying amyloid and tau PET status in a risk‐enriched preclinical Alzheimer's disease cohort. Method 190 plasma samples from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention and the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center were selected and analyzed using the Lumipulse ® G pTau 217 Plasma assay. Another set of 451 plasma samples were selected and analyzed using the Lumipulse ® G pTau 217/β‐Amyloid 1‐42 Plasma Ratio. 38 samples were analyzed using both assays. Amyloid and tau positivity were determined based on visual reads of [C‐11]PiB and [F‐18]Florquinitau PET scans, respectively. We used ROC analyses to assess the amyloid and tau classification performance of the biomarkers. We used Spearman correlations to compare plasma pTau217 levels in the samples that were analyzed using both assays. All analyses were cross‐sectional and the maximum time difference between plasma and PET assessment was two years. Result Sample characteristics for both the Lumipulse ® G pTau 217 and Lumipulse ® G pTau 217/β‐Amyloid 1‐42 Plasma Ratio data subsets are provided in Table 1. The ROC AUC of pTau217 was .93 for amyloid PET (95% CI .89‐.98, accuracy 86%) and .93 for tau PET (95% CI .87‐.99, accuracy 88%; Figure 1). The ROC AUC of the pTau217/Abeta 42 ratio was .93 for amyloid PET (95% CI .89 ‐ .97, accuracy 90%) and .90 for tau PET (95% CI .83‐.96, accuracy 68%; Figure 2). The Spearman correlation between plasma pTau217 levels was .92. Conclusion Both the Lumipulse ® G pTau 217 Plasma assay and the Lumipulse ® G pTau 217/β‐Amyloid 1‐42 Plasma Ratio accurately classified amyloid and tau status in this largely cognitively unimpaired, preclinical cohort.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation (HK), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Wisconsin Division of Public Health (US), University College London (GB), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.