Differential interference of body- and non-body-related representational conflicts on error and performance monitoring in flanker tasks

The performance monitoring system handles representational conflicts with the goal of reducing errors. What remains unclear is whether and how the representational nature of a stimulus modulates conflict resolution. To deal with this issue, we performed five experiments to measure the degree of cognitive interference occurring in Flanker tasks and tested whether effects induced by body- and non-body-related stimuli may change as a function of task requirements and affect conflict processing. In Experiment1, conflicts elicited by hands/letters were used to activate typical competing responses. In Experiment2, stimuli were perceptually matched for low-level features (e.g., target/flanker contrast). In Experiment3, no-go trials were added to increase conflict load and reveal content-driven effects in inhibitory control. In Experiment 4, the onset of target/flanker competition was set at two different delays to investigate conflict persistence during target processing. Finally, in Experiment5, body- vs. non-body-related stimuli were combined to measure content-driven effects underlying conflict resolution. A multi-analysis approach to data was employed, combining linear and Bayesian drift-diffusion models. Results show that body-related representations reduced cognitive interference, a robust effect that was observed across all experiments. These findings suggest that representations related to the body selectively engage the performance monitoring system during conflict processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35124-1
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential interference of body- and non-body-related representational conflicts on error and performance monitoring in flanker tasks

Salvatore Maria Aglioti, Marco Spitaleri, Michele Scandola, Gabriele Fusco
Scientific Reports
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Differential interference of body- and non-body-related representational conflicts on error and performance monitoring in flanker tasks

Salvatore Maria Aglioti, Marco Spitaleri, Michele Scandola, Gabriele Fusco
article en

Abstract

The performance monitoring system handles representational conflicts with the goal of reducing errors. What remains unclear is whether and how the representational nature of a stimulus modulates conflict resolution. To deal with this issue, we performed five experiments to measure the degree of cognitive interference occurring in Flanker tasks and tested whether effects induced by body- and non-body-related stimuli may change as a function of task requirements and affect conflict processing. In Experiment1, conflicts elicited by hands/letters were used to activate typical competing responses. In Experiment2, stimuli were perceptually matched for low-level features (e.g., target/flanker contrast). In Experiment3, no-go trials were added to increase conflict load and reveal content-driven effects in inhibitory control. In Experiment 4, the onset of target/flanker competition was set at two different delays to investigate conflict persistence during target processing. Finally, in Experiment5, body- vs. non-body-related stimuli were combined to measure content-driven effects underlying conflict resolution. A multi-analysis approach to data was employed, combining linear and Bayesian drift-diffusion models. Results show that body-related representations reduced cognitive interference, a robust effect that was observed across all experiments. These findings suggest that representations related to the body selectively engage the performance monitoring system during conflict processing.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
University of Verona (IT), Italian Institute of Technology (IT), Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.