Transparency and Explainable AI: Bridging Privacy, Fairness, and Accountability

This paper examines whether Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) can address AI ethics, specifically, privacy, fairness, and accountability, by linking technical transparency with interpretability to facilitate ethical oversight. It combines review and normative analysis from multiple fields. Three case studies - COMPAS, Uber, and Clearview AI - illustrate XAI's role in revealing biases, tracing accountability, and identifying privacy risks. We argue that transparency alone is insufficient; understanding is hindered by overload, misinterpretation, and lack of context. Effective explainability requires coupling transparency with interpretability within legal, social, and organizational frameworks. XAI highlights ethical issues but needs human judgment and safeguards. The paper connects XAI to ethical principles, demonstrating that explainability is necessary but insufficient, and emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary and regulatory collaboration, such as the EU AI Act, to guide the development of responsible AI.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
R-libre (Université Téluq)
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24818/rmci.2025.5.994
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transparency and Explainable AI: Bridging Privacy, Fairness, and Accountability

Dragos Vieru, Renée-Maria Schmitt
R-libre (Université Téluq)
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Transparency and Explainable AI: Bridging Privacy, Fairness, and Accountability

Dragos Vieru, Renée-Maria Schmitt
article en

Abstract

This paper examines whether Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) can address AI ethics, specifically, privacy, fairness, and accountability, by linking technical transparency with interpretability to facilitate ethical oversight. It combines review and normative analysis from multiple fields. Three case studies - COMPAS, Uber, and Clearview AI - illustrate XAI's role in revealing biases, tracing accountability, and identifying privacy risks. We argue that transparency alone is insufficient; understanding is hindered by overload, misinterpretation, and lack of context. Effective explainability requires coupling transparency with interpretability within legal, social, and organizational frameworks. XAI highlights ethical issues but needs human judgment and safeguards. The paper connects XAI to ethical principles, demonstrating that explainability is necessary but insufficient, and emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary and regulatory collaboration, such as the EU AI Act, to guide the development of responsible AI.

R-libre (Université Téluq)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.