Investigating the contribution of tongue strength measurement in determining pre‐clinical Alzheimer's disease pathology in older adults

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) accounts for 60‐70% of dementia cases. Pathological changes begin 15‐20 years before symptoms appear. Identifying non‐invasive biomarkers to detect these changes are required. Gait speed, hand movements and grip strength have been associated with cognitive decline. A recent review also documented associations between cognitive decline and decreased tongue strength. The current study investigated the association of tongue strength with grip and pinch strength and a blood biomarker of AD (plasma p ‐tau 181) in cognitively healthy older (adults ≥ 50 years). Method This cross‐sectional study involved participants from the ISLAND Project in Tasmania who completed motor assessments and blood samples analysed for p ‐tau 181. Pearson's correlation coefficients determined the correlation of tongue strength with pinch and grip strength across different p ‐tau 181 tertiles. One‐way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD tests were used to compare and identify groups with significant mean Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (SMI) differences across tongue tertiles. A multivariable linear regression model was fitted, adjusted for possible confounders, determined after Directed Acyclic Graph analysis. Result 158 participants (75 % female) with a mean age of 69.32 (±6.7) years were recruited. Mean tongue strength was 48.09 kPa (±10.49) and mean p ‐tau 181 was 1.37 pg/ml (±0.57). Participants with normal tongue strength had lower mean p ‐tau 181 levels (1.36 pg/ml) than those with lower tongue strength (1.43 pg/ml). The mean SMI of participants in the highest tongue tertile (7.8 kg/m 2 ) was higher than those in the second tertile (7.03 kg/m 2 ) ( p = 0.0329, 95% CI (0.06,1.47)). Tongue strength was positively correlated with pinch ( r = 0.45, p <0.001) and grip strength ( r = 0.35, p = 0.01), established markers of cognitive decline. The correlation was more pronounced as p ‐tau 181 levels increased. No mean tongue strength difference or associations were observed across the p ‐tau 181 tertiles or in the multivariable regression analysis. Conclusion The higher mean p ‐tau 181 level observed in individuals with lower tongue strength, along with the effect of p ‐tau 181 level on tongue strength with grip and pinch strength correlations, speaks to the contribution of tongue strength measurement in determining preclinical AD pathology. Future longitudinal studies are needed to better understand the observed associations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_105356
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the contribution of tongue strength measurement in determining pre‐clinical Alzheimer's disease pathology in older adults

Lynette Ruth Goldberg, Getachew Yideg Yitbarek, Jane Alty, Eddy Roccati et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Investigating the contribution of tongue strength measurement in determining pre‐clinical Alzheimer's disease pathology in older adults

Lynette Ruth Goldberg, Getachew Yideg Yitbarek, Jane Alty, Eddy Roccati, Katherine Lawler
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) accounts for 60‐70% of dementia cases. Pathological changes begin 15‐20 years before symptoms appear. Identifying non‐invasive biomarkers to detect these changes are required. Gait speed, hand movements and grip strength have been associated with cognitive decline. A recent review also documented associations between cognitive decline and decreased tongue strength. The current study investigated the association of tongue strength with grip and pinch strength and a blood biomarker of AD (plasma p ‐tau 181) in cognitively healthy older (adults ≥ 50 years). Method This cross‐sectional study involved participants from the ISLAND Project in Tasmania who completed motor assessments and blood samples analysed for p ‐tau 181. Pearson's correlation coefficients determined the correlation of tongue strength with pinch and grip strength across different p ‐tau 181 tertiles. One‐way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD tests were used to compare and identify groups with significant mean Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (SMI) differences across tongue tertiles. A multivariable linear regression model was fitted, adjusted for possible confounders, determined after Directed Acyclic Graph analysis. Result 158 participants (75 % female) with a mean age of 69.32 (±6.7) years were recruited. Mean tongue strength was 48.09 kPa (±10.49) and mean p ‐tau 181 was 1.37 pg/ml (±0.57). Participants with normal tongue strength had lower mean p ‐tau 181 levels (1.36 pg/ml) than those with lower tongue strength (1.43 pg/ml). The mean SMI of participants in the highest tongue tertile (7.8 kg/m 2 ) was higher than those in the second tertile (7.03 kg/m 2 ) ( p = 0.0329, 95% CI (0.06,1.47)). Tongue strength was positively correlated with pinch ( r = 0.45, p <0.001) and grip strength ( r = 0.35, p = 0.01), established markers of cognitive decline. The correlation was more pronounced as p ‐tau 181 levels increased. No mean tongue strength difference or associations were observed across the p ‐tau 181 tertiles or in the multivariable regression analysis. Conclusion The higher mean p ‐tau 181 level observed in individuals with lower tongue strength, along with the effect of p ‐tau 181 level on tongue strength with grip and pinch strength correlations, speaks to the contribution of tongue strength measurement in determining preclinical AD pathology. Future longitudinal studies are needed to better understand the observed associations.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
University of Tasmania (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Royal Hobart Hospital (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.