Revisiting multi-region 16S sequencing in gastric cancer

Wu <i>et al</i> recently applied multi-region 16S rRNA sequencing to characterize the gastric cancer microbiome, demonstrating improved taxonomic resolution and detection sensitivity over conventional single-region approaches. While the study represents a valuable methodological step forward, it remains limited by single-center design, lack of quantitative calibration, and insufficient control for contamination and inter-laboratory variability. This editorial critically appraises these methodological gaps and emphasizes that future efforts must focus on harmonized, consensus-driven workflows to ensure reproducibility and clinical reliability. The translational potential of multi-region 16S lies in moving from descriptive microbial profiling to actionable clinical integration, particularly for recurrence prediction, treatment-response monitoring, and perioperative complication risk assessment. By addressing these methodological, economic, and ethical challenges, the field can advance toward evidence-based and clinically deployable microbiome-guided precision oncology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i1.114708
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting multi-region 16S sequencing in gastric cancer

Gang Huang, Hao Chi, Liu Luo, Hua Yang
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Revisiting multi-region 16S sequencing in gastric cancer

Gang Huang, Hao Chi, Liu Luo, Hua Yang
article en

Abstract

Wu <i>et al</i> recently applied multi-region 16S rRNA sequencing to characterize the gastric cancer microbiome, demonstrating improved taxonomic resolution and detection sensitivity over conventional single-region approaches. While the study represents a valuable methodological step forward, it remains limited by single-center design, lack of quantitative calibration, and insufficient control for contamination and inter-laboratory variability. This editorial critically appraises these methodological gaps and emphasizes that future efforts must focus on harmonized, consensus-driven workflows to ensure reproducibility and clinical reliability. The translational potential of multi-region 16S lies in moving from descriptive microbial profiling to actionable clinical integration, particularly for recurrence prediction, treatment-response monitoring, and perioperative complication risk assessment. By addressing these methodological, economic, and ethical challenges, the field can advance toward evidence-based and clinically deployable microbiome-guided precision oncology.

World Journal of Gastrointestinal OncologyVol. 18(1)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), Southwest Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.