Comparison of Responses across Stimulus Types in a Verb Production Task among Typically Developing 3- and 4- Year-old Children

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of static versus dynamic stimuli on a verb production task in typically developing children aged 3 to 4 years. Specifically, the study examined differences in accuracy, response time, and error patterns across stimulus types and age groups. Methods: Thirty-two typically developing children (16 aged 3 years, 16 aged 4 years) participated in a verb production task consisting of 30 target verbs. Each child was presented with both photo-based static stimuli and video-based dynamic stimuli. Measures included naming accuracy, response latency, and error type categorization. Group differences by age and stimulus type, as well as potential interaction effects, were analyzed. Results: Children showed significantly higher accuracy in dynamic conditions than in static conditions. Four-year-olds outperformed three-year-olds overall, although no interaction effect was found between stimulus type and age. Response times were longer in the dynamic condition than in the static condition, regardless of age. Error analysis indicated reductions in “directional antonym” and “substitution” errors when the stimulus type shifted from static to dynamic. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that dynamic stimuli enhance accuracy and alter error patterns in verb production tasks, thereby providing more meaningful information than static stimuli. These findings offer empirical evidence for the development of language assessment and intervention tools based on dynamic stimuli that reflect the characteristics of verbs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Eon'eo cheong'gag jang'ae yeon'gu/Communication sciences & disorders
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.250153
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Responses across Stimulus Types in a Verb Production Task among Typically Developing 3- and 4- Year-old Children

Gyung Hun Hong, Yoo Seon Choi
Eon'eo cheong'gag jang'ae yeon'gu/Communication sciences & disorders
Language Development and Disorders
article

Comparison of Responses across Stimulus Types in a Verb Production Task among Typically Developing 3- and 4- Year-old Children

Gyung Hun Hong, Yoo Seon Choi
article en

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of static versus dynamic stimuli on a verb production task in typically developing children aged 3 to 4 years. Specifically, the study examined differences in accuracy, response time, and error patterns across stimulus types and age groups. Methods: Thirty-two typically developing children (16 aged 3 years, 16 aged 4 years) participated in a verb production task consisting of 30 target verbs. Each child was presented with both photo-based static stimuli and video-based dynamic stimuli. Measures included naming accuracy, response latency, and error type categorization. Group differences by age and stimulus type, as well as potential interaction effects, were analyzed. Results: Children showed significantly higher accuracy in dynamic conditions than in static conditions. Four-year-olds outperformed three-year-olds overall, although no interaction effect was found between stimulus type and age. Response times were longer in the dynamic condition than in the static condition, regardless of age. Error analysis indicated reductions in “directional antonym” and “substitution” errors when the stimulus type shifted from static to dynamic. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that dynamic stimuli enhance accuracy and alter error patterns in verb production tasks, thereby providing more meaningful information than static stimuli. These findings offer empirical evidence for the development of language assessment and intervention tools based on dynamic stimuli that reflect the characteristics of verbs.

Eon'eo cheong'gag jang'ae yeon'gu/Communication sciences & disordersVol. 30(4)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.