Teaching Beyond Normalisation: Rethinking Standards-Based Reforms Through Canguilhem

Standards-based reforms (SBRs), such as the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST), have reshaped teachers’ work and redefined what counts as professional judgement and pedagogic practice. In this paper, we reflect on the logic of remedyism embedded in SBR policies such as the APST, through the theoretical lens of the French philosopher Georges Canguilhem. While such policies are widely understood to normalise teachers’ work in a Foucauldian sense, we argue, following Canguilhem, that it is equally important to foreground pedagogic normativity—that is, the capacity of schools and teachers to create context-specific pedagogic practices and possibilities, within complex social realities, through the creation of their own norms, often in the silence of policy technologies. This conception does not endorse normalisation; rather, it resists the technical and performative deployment of teaching standards in policy enactment, which tends to homogenise, universalise, and standardise pedagogy. Teaching, from this perspective, is better understood as a creative enterprise that demands continual modification of pedagogic designs and interactions, in response to the changing needs of students, education systems, and social milieus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Philosophy and Education
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-025-10035-2
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching Beyond Normalisation: Rethinking Standards-Based Reforms Through Canguilhem

Henry Kwok, Parlo Singh
Studies in Philosophy and Education
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

Teaching Beyond Normalisation: Rethinking Standards-Based Reforms Through Canguilhem

Henry Kwok, Parlo Singh
article en

Abstract

Standards-based reforms (SBRs), such as the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST), have reshaped teachers’ work and redefined what counts as professional judgement and pedagogic practice. In this paper, we reflect on the logic of remedyism embedded in SBR policies such as the APST, through the theoretical lens of the French philosopher Georges Canguilhem. While such policies are widely understood to normalise teachers’ work in a Foucauldian sense, we argue, following Canguilhem, that it is equally important to foreground pedagogic normativity—that is, the capacity of schools and teachers to create context-specific pedagogic practices and possibilities, within complex social realities, through the creation of their own norms, often in the silence of policy technologies. This conception does not endorse normalisation; rather, it resists the technical and performative deployment of teaching standards in policy enactment, which tends to homogenise, universalise, and standardise pedagogy. Teaching, from this perspective, is better understood as a creative enterprise that demands continual modification of pedagogic designs and interactions, in response to the changing needs of students, education systems, and social milieus.

Studies in Philosophy and EducationVol. 45(1)
Griffith University (AU), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Teaching Beyond Normalisation: Rethinking Standards-Based Reforms Through Canguilhem — Henry Kwok, Parlo Singh · Studies in Philosophy and Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS