The Performance and Potential of Deep Learning for Predicting Species Distributions

ABSTRACT Aim Species distribution models (SDMs) address the whereabouts of species and are central to ecology. Deep learning (DL) is poised to further elevate the already significant role of SDMs in ecology and conservation, but the potential and limitations of this transformation are still largely unassessed. Location North America. Time Period 2009–2021. Major Taxa Studied Mammals, amphibians, reptiles, ants, and butterflies. Methods We evaluate DL SDMs for 2299 terrestrial vertebrate and invertebrate species at continental scale and 0.00833° resolution in a like‐for‐like comparison with latest implementation of conventional SDMs. We compare two DL methods (a multi‐layer perceptron (MLP) on point covariates and a convolutional neural network (CNN) on geospatial patches) against non‐DL SDMs (Maxent and Random Forest), emphasising fair comparison and induced pitfalls from information leakage, species imbalances, and location biases. Results On average, DL models match, but do not surpass, the performance of non‐DL methods. DL performance is moderately to substantially weaker for species with narrow geographic ranges, fewer data points, and those assessed as threatened and hence often of greatest conservation concern. Furthermore, information leakage across dataset splits substantially inflates performance metrics, especially of CNNs. Main Conclusions Our results indicate that biases known from conventional SDM settings are strongly amplified for DL models. Although recent advancements in DL draw promising new avenues for ecological process modelling, their benefits beyond improved numerical performance can only be met when pitfalls are accounted for. Realising the potential of DL in its entirety will thus require a closer collaboration between ecology and machine learning disciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70184
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
66.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Performance and Potential of Deep Learning for Predicting Species Distributions

W. Jetz, Kevin Winner, Benjamin Kellenberger
2 citations
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Species Distribution and Climate Change
66.98
article

The Performance and Potential of Deep Learning for Predicting Species Distributions

W. Jetz, Kevin Winner, Benjamin Kellenberger
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Species distribution models (SDMs) address the whereabouts of species and are central to ecology. Deep learning (DL) is poised to further elevate the already significant role of SDMs in ecology and conservation, but the potential and limitations of this transformation are still largely unassessed. Location North America. Time Period 2009–2021. Major Taxa Studied Mammals, amphibians, reptiles, ants, and butterflies. Methods We evaluate DL SDMs for 2299 terrestrial vertebrate and invertebrate species at continental scale and 0.00833° resolution in a like‐for‐like comparison with latest implementation of conventional SDMs. We compare two DL methods (a multi‐layer perceptron (MLP) on point covariates and a convolutional neural network (CNN) on geospatial patches) against non‐DL SDMs (Maxent and Random Forest), emphasising fair comparison and induced pitfalls from information leakage, species imbalances, and location biases. Results On average, DL models match, but do not surpass, the performance of non‐DL methods. DL performance is moderately to substantially weaker for species with narrow geographic ranges, fewer data points, and those assessed as threatened and hence often of greatest conservation concern. Furthermore, information leakage across dataset splits substantially inflates performance metrics, especially of CNNs. Main Conclusions Our results indicate that biases known from conventional SDM settings are strongly amplified for DL models. Although recent advancements in DL draw promising new avenues for ecological process modelling, their benefits beyond improved numerical performance can only be met when pitfalls are accounted for. Realising the potential of DL in its entirety will thus require a closer collaboration between ecology and machine learning disciplines.

Global Ecology and BiogeographyVol. 35(1)
Yale University (US), University College London (GB)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
66.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Performance and Potential of Deep Learning for Predicting Species Distributions — W. Jetz, Kevin Winner, et al. · Global Ecology and Biogeography (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS