Concerned, but not impressed: China eyes NATO's engagement in the Asia–Pacific

Abstract This article examines how Chinese observers perceive NATO's engagement in the Asia–Pacific region. While officials portray NATO as an increasing threat to China, Chinese analysts and scholars are ambivalent about NATO's ability to impact Chinese security. Analysing writings published between 2022 and 2025, we find three broad patterns. First, observers in China see NATO's policies as part of a broader US containment strategy, and express concern about that strategy's impact on China's political ties to Europe. Second, many argue that European allies' limited capabilities and a lack of alliance cohesion constrain NATO's efforts to play a role in the Asia–Pacific. Third, Chinese analysts advocate for wedge strategies, calling for China to exploit transatlantic divisions through economic inducements and diplomatic engagement with Europe. Under a second Trump presidency, Chinese analysts anticipate that the transatlantic rift will widen further, undermining NATO's efforts to play a role in the Asia–Pacific. Our findings underscore how a firmly rooted realpolitik perspective permeates Chinese debates: NATO's engagement is frequently analysed in balance-of-power terms in these debates, and observers regard European states' lack of hard power as a fundamental weakness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Affairs
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaf192
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concerned, but not impressed: China eyes NATO's engagement in the Asia–Pacific

Henrik Stålhane Hiim, Rebekka Åsnes Sagild
International Affairs
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Concerned, but not impressed: China eyes NATO's engagement in the Asia–Pacific

Henrik Stålhane Hiim, Rebekka Åsnes Sagild
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how Chinese observers perceive NATO's engagement in the Asia–Pacific region. While officials portray NATO as an increasing threat to China, Chinese analysts and scholars are ambivalent about NATO's ability to impact Chinese security. Analysing writings published between 2022 and 2025, we find three broad patterns. First, observers in China see NATO's policies as part of a broader US containment strategy, and express concern about that strategy's impact on China's political ties to Europe. Second, many argue that European allies' limited capabilities and a lack of alliance cohesion constrain NATO's efforts to play a role in the Asia–Pacific. Third, Chinese analysts advocate for wedge strategies, calling for China to exploit transatlantic divisions through economic inducements and diplomatic engagement with Europe. Under a second Trump presidency, Chinese analysts anticipate that the transatlantic rift will widen further, undermining NATO's efforts to play a role in the Asia–Pacific. Our findings underscore how a firmly rooted realpolitik perspective permeates Chinese debates: NATO's engagement is frequently analysed in balance-of-power terms in these debates, and observers regard European states' lack of hard power as a fundamental weakness.

International AffairsVol. 102(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.