Detecting expertise in decision making under pressure: a virtual reality assessment environment and empirical evaluation

Professions such as military, aviation, submarine operation, and emergency response require individuals to navigate complex environments characterized by limited information, stringent time constraints, and significant pressures. Effective decision making under pressure is crucial in safety-critical professions, yet measuring this expertise remains challenging. Inspired by the military context, this article introduces the virtual reality decision-making expertise (VR-DMX) environment, designed to evaluate decision-making expertise under time constraints within a virtual reality scenario. VR-DMX simulates an amusement arcade where users must decide how to allocate time across various games to maximize ticket earnings. Through two validation studies (N = 60 and N = 76), we examined two metrics: Total Tickets (measuring overall performance) and DMX score (isolating decision-making quality). Both metrics demonstrated symmetrical distributions without floor or ceiling effects, with coefficients of variation comparable to established individual difference measures (32.4-37.4% for Total Tickets; 20.8-27.6% for DMX score). The moderate correlation between metrics (meta-analysis r = 0.771, 95% CI [0.599, 0.943]) indicates they measure related but distinct constructs. Our findings indicate that VR-DMX effectively differentiates individual performance levels and captures a distinct decision-making component that is separate from general cognitive abilities. Comparing decision-making expertise between professionals in safety-critical fields with those without such experience would be a sensible next step to help validate the potential for selection and training applications. VR-DMX was designed to measure decision-making expertise in safety-critical contexts, and initial validation data demonstrating effective differentiation of individual performance levels suggest that continued development could fulfill this design intention for applications in selection, training, and performance prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00695-6
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting expertise in decision making under pressure: a virtual reality assessment environment and empirical evaluation

Guillermo Campitelli, Varun Gandhi, Alexandra Richardson-Newton, Matthew B. Thompson
Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Detecting expertise in decision making under pressure: a virtual reality assessment environment and empirical evaluation

Guillermo Campitelli, Varun Gandhi, Alexandra Richardson-Newton, Matthew B. Thompson
article en

Abstract

Professions such as military, aviation, submarine operation, and emergency response require individuals to navigate complex environments characterized by limited information, stringent time constraints, and significant pressures. Effective decision making under pressure is crucial in safety-critical professions, yet measuring this expertise remains challenging. Inspired by the military context, this article introduces the virtual reality decision-making expertise (VR-DMX) environment, designed to evaluate decision-making expertise under time constraints within a virtual reality scenario. VR-DMX simulates an amusement arcade where users must decide how to allocate time across various games to maximize ticket earnings. Through two validation studies (N = 60 and N = 76), we examined two metrics: Total Tickets (measuring overall performance) and DMX score (isolating decision-making quality). Both metrics demonstrated symmetrical distributions without floor or ceiling effects, with coefficients of variation comparable to established individual difference measures (32.4-37.4% for Total Tickets; 20.8-27.6% for DMX score). The moderate correlation between metrics (meta-analysis r = 0.771, 95% CI [0.599, 0.943]) indicates they measure related but distinct constructs. Our findings indicate that VR-DMX effectively differentiates individual performance levels and captures a distinct decision-making component that is separate from general cognitive abilities. Comparing decision-making expertise between professionals in safety-critical fields with those without such experience would be a sensible next step to help validate the potential for selection and training applications. VR-DMX was designed to measure decision-making expertise in safety-critical contexts, and initial validation data demonstrating effective differentiation of individual performance levels suggest that continued development could fulfill this design intention for applications in selection, training, and performance prediction.

Cognitive Research Principles and ImplicationsVol. 11(1)
Murdoch University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.