Clinical and radiographic evaluation of autologous albumin-rich platelet-rich fibrin membrane versus synthetic collagen membrane for immediate dental implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone: a preliminary randomized clinical trial

Long-term aesthetic stability following immediate implant placement depends on achieving predictable bone regeneration within the peri-implant “jumping gap” and existing labial bone defects. Despite using a beta-tricalcium phosphate/calcium sulfate putty bone graft (β-TCP + CS), regenerative membranes are essential adjuncts to ensure superior healing. Therefore, this preliminary study aimed to determine whether autologous Albumin-Platelet-Rich Fibrin (Alb-PRF) provides superior aesthetic and osseous outcomes compared with the standard synthetic collagen membrane. This single-blind, preliminary randomized clinical trial involved 20 participants with a non-restorable maxillary aesthetic tooth and a labial bone defect who received immediate implants. Participants were allocated into two groups (n=10 each): Group I received a β-TCP + CS putty combined with a synthetic collagen membrane, while Group II received the same bone graft combined with an Alb-PRF membrane placed in the labial jumping gap. Primary outcome variables, including marginal bone loss (MBL) and labial bone thickness (LBT), were assessed via CBCT at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and clinical parameters (Plaque Index, Bleeding on Probing, and Peri-implant Probing Depth), which were measured at baseline, 4, 6, and 12 months post-surgery. Clinical parameters showed no significant inter-group differences. However, Group II demonstrated significantly higher PES scores at 4 months (p=0.027) and 12 months (p=0.018). While Group I exhibited significantly better preservation of LBT at 6 months (p=0.005) and 12 months (p=0.001), Group II showed significantly less MBL at 6 months (P ≤ 0.001) and 12 months (p=0.023). Both membranes effectively treat peri-implant defects. While the collagen membrane better preserves labial bone thickness, Alb-PRF yields superior aesthetic scores and reduces marginal bone loss. This preliminary randomized clinical trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and approved on 15/10/2024 with trial number (NCT06643468).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-07683-2
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of autologous albumin-rich platelet-rich fibrin membrane versus synthetic collagen membrane for immediate dental implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone: a preliminary randomized clinical trial

Islam H. Kandil, Jilan Mohammed Youssef, Nesma Elgohary, Hamza Alsabahi et al.
BMC Oral Health
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of autologous albumin-rich platelet-rich fibrin membrane versus synthetic collagen membrane for immediate dental implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone: a preliminary randomized clinical trial

Islam H. Kandil, Jilan Mohammed Youssef, Nesma Elgohary, Hamza Alsabahi, Bassant Mowafey
article en

Abstract

Long-term aesthetic stability following immediate implant placement depends on achieving predictable bone regeneration within the peri-implant “jumping gap” and existing labial bone defects. Despite using a beta-tricalcium phosphate/calcium sulfate putty bone graft (β-TCP + CS), regenerative membranes are essential adjuncts to ensure superior healing. Therefore, this preliminary study aimed to determine whether autologous Albumin-Platelet-Rich Fibrin (Alb-PRF) provides superior aesthetic and osseous outcomes compared with the standard synthetic collagen membrane. This single-blind, preliminary randomized clinical trial involved 20 participants with a non-restorable maxillary aesthetic tooth and a labial bone defect who received immediate implants. Participants were allocated into two groups (n=10 each): Group I received a β-TCP + CS putty combined with a synthetic collagen membrane, while Group II received the same bone graft combined with an Alb-PRF membrane placed in the labial jumping gap. Primary outcome variables, including marginal bone loss (MBL) and labial bone thickness (LBT), were assessed via CBCT at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and clinical parameters (Plaque Index, Bleeding on Probing, and Peri-implant Probing Depth), which were measured at baseline, 4, 6, and 12 months post-surgery. Clinical parameters showed no significant inter-group differences. However, Group II demonstrated significantly higher PES scores at 4 months (p=0.027) and 12 months (p=0.018). While Group I exhibited significantly better preservation of LBT at 6 months (p=0.005) and 12 months (p=0.001), Group II showed significantly less MBL at 6 months (P ≤ 0.001) and 12 months (p=0.023). Both membranes effectively treat peri-implant defects. While the collagen membrane better preserves labial bone thickness, Alb-PRF yields superior aesthetic scores and reduces marginal bone loss. This preliminary randomized clinical trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and approved on 15/10/2024 with trial number (NCT06643468).

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Mansoura University (EG), Ibb University (YE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.