Employers' beliefs and hiring preferences for older workers: insights from Singapore

Purpose This study examines how employer perceptions influence hiring preferences for older workers, comparing their perceptions on mature (ages 50–59) and senior (ages 60+) workers. Design/methodology/approach We collect a nationwide survey of HR managers in Singapore, surveying employers' perceptions and valuation of older workers and categorising them into behavioural, normative and control beliefs. Findings This study finds that employers in Singapore hold distinct hiring preferences for mature workers (aged 50–59) and senior workers (60+), shaped by differences in behavioural, normative and control beliefs. In terms of behavioural beliefs, leadership and interpersonal skills increased the employability of mature workers but had neutral or negative effects for senior workers. For normative beliefs, supportive attitudes towards later-life employment – such as rejecting fixed retirement ages or valuing training – were linked to greater hiring of mature workers, but had little to no impact on hiring senior workers. Regarding control beliefs, mature workers benefitted from access to internal training opportunities, while senior workers were more likely to be hired in response to labour shortages. Originality/value The results underscore the need to disaggregate the category of “older workers” in HRM practices and policies, as employers' beliefs and organisational conditions shape subgroup-specific hiring biases. Distinct strategies should be devised to reintroduce mature and senior workers back into the labour force to promote their productive longevity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Manpower
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-02-2025-0151
Primary Topic
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Employers' beliefs and hiring preferences for older workers: insights from Singapore

Joelle H. Fong, Zeewan Lee, Leng Leng Thang, Xinyi Chen et al.
International Journal of Manpower
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
article

Employers' beliefs and hiring preferences for older workers: insights from Singapore

Joelle H. Fong, Zeewan Lee, Leng Leng Thang, Xinyi Chen, Hui Foh Foong
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines how employer perceptions influence hiring preferences for older workers, comparing their perceptions on mature (ages 50–59) and senior (ages 60+) workers. Design/methodology/approach We collect a nationwide survey of HR managers in Singapore, surveying employers' perceptions and valuation of older workers and categorising them into behavioural, normative and control beliefs. Findings This study finds that employers in Singapore hold distinct hiring preferences for mature workers (aged 50–59) and senior workers (60+), shaped by differences in behavioural, normative and control beliefs. In terms of behavioural beliefs, leadership and interpersonal skills increased the employability of mature workers but had neutral or negative effects for senior workers. For normative beliefs, supportive attitudes towards later-life employment – such as rejecting fixed retirement ages or valuing training – were linked to greater hiring of mature workers, but had little to no impact on hiring senior workers. Regarding control beliefs, mature workers benefitted from access to internal training opportunities, while senior workers were more likely to be hired in response to labour shortages. Originality/value The results underscore the need to disaggregate the category of “older workers” in HRM practices and policies, as employers' beliefs and organisational conditions shape subgroup-specific hiring biases. Distinct strategies should be devised to reintroduce mature and senior workers back into the labour force to promote their productive longevity.

International Journal of Manpower
National University of Singapore (SG)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.