Interpreting positive plasma Aβ42/40 results when amyloid PET is negative

Abstract Background The agreement between plasma Aβ42/40 and Aβ‐PET is approximately 75%, with a large portion of discrepancies due to positive plasma with negative PET results. Questions remain about whether these reflect brain Aβ changes detectable in plasma before PET‐detectable. We aimed to examine these cases over 11 years to assess the risk and timing of progression to Aβ‐PET positivity. Method Cognitively unimpaired participants from large‐scale longitudinal studies of AIBL, OASIS, and ADNI underwent baseline Aβ‐PET and plasma Aβ42/40 analysis by IPMS, followed by 1‐7 additional PET scans every 1.5‐3 years. Aβ‐PET was quantified to Centiloid (CL) using the SPM pipeline. Individuals with baseline Aβ‐PET < 20 CL ( n = 507) were included, with those < 5 CL classified as PET‐, and 5‐20 CL as PET Low . Plasma ‐/+ was based on the Aβ42/40 Youden's Index threshold (0.119) corresponding to Aβ‐PET status. We used Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess the risk of progression to PET+ (> 20 CL). Result Plasma+/PET‐ (< 5 CL) individuals were at higher risk than Plasma‐/PET‐ of progressing to PET+ (hazard ratio (HR): 3.90 [95% CI: 2.00‐7.61], p <0.001), even after matching the groups’ baseline CL values (HR: 3.43 [1.43‐8.26], p = 0.010), or adjusting for age, sex, APOE ε4 and baseline CL (HR: 2.48 [1.22 ‐ 5.07], p = 0.013) (Figure 1A). Plasma+/PET‐ accumulated brain Aβ ∼8 times faster than Plasma‐/PET‐ (1.14 CL/year vs. 0.15 CL/year respectively, p <0.001). Plasma+/PET‐ progressors became PET+, on average, 2 years earlier than Plasma‐/PET‐ progressors. Plasma+/PET Low group had faster decline in survival probability than Plasma‐/PET Low (HR: 20.82 [11.28 – 38.42], p <0.001 vs. HR: 6.67 [3.51 – 12.65], p <0.001) (Figure 1B) but this was driven by higher CL in the Plasma+ group. Conclusion Cognitively unimpaired individuals with abnormal plasma Aβ42/40 but negative Aβ‐PET face a significantly increased risk of future positive Aβ‐PET. This provides supporting evidence that brain Aβ pathology can be detected in plasma with IPMS before it is PET‐detectable. Whether this also applies to plasma Aβ42/40 immunoassays warrants investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_105405
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreting positive plasma Aβ42/40 results when amyloid PET is negative

Leigh C. Ward, Azadeh Feizpour, Dr James Doecke, J. Newman Morris et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Interpreting positive plasma Aβ42/40 results when amyloid PET is negative

Leigh C. Ward, Azadeh Feizpour, Dr James Doecke, J. Newman Morris, Christopher C. Rowe, Pierrick Bourgeat, Jurgen Fripp, Colin L. Masters, Randall J. Bateman, Tenielle Porter, Kun Huang, Rodrigo Canovas, Christopher J Fowler, Simon M. Laws, Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Suzanne E. Schindler, Victor L. Villemagne, Michael W Weiner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The agreement between plasma Aβ42/40 and Aβ‐PET is approximately 75%, with a large portion of discrepancies due to positive plasma with negative PET results. Questions remain about whether these reflect brain Aβ changes detectable in plasma before PET‐detectable. We aimed to examine these cases over 11 years to assess the risk and timing of progression to Aβ‐PET positivity. Method Cognitively unimpaired participants from large‐scale longitudinal studies of AIBL, OASIS, and ADNI underwent baseline Aβ‐PET and plasma Aβ42/40 analysis by IPMS, followed by 1‐7 additional PET scans every 1.5‐3 years. Aβ‐PET was quantified to Centiloid (CL) using the SPM pipeline. Individuals with baseline Aβ‐PET < 20 CL ( n = 507) were included, with those < 5 CL classified as PET‐, and 5‐20 CL as PET Low . Plasma ‐/+ was based on the Aβ42/40 Youden's Index threshold (0.119) corresponding to Aβ‐PET status. We used Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess the risk of progression to PET+ (> 20 CL). Result Plasma+/PET‐ (< 5 CL) individuals were at higher risk than Plasma‐/PET‐ of progressing to PET+ (hazard ratio (HR): 3.90 [95% CI: 2.00‐7.61], p <0.001), even after matching the groups’ baseline CL values (HR: 3.43 [1.43‐8.26], p = 0.010), or adjusting for age, sex, APOE ε4 and baseline CL (HR: 2.48 [1.22 ‐ 5.07], p = 0.013) (Figure 1A). Plasma+/PET‐ accumulated brain Aβ ∼8 times faster than Plasma‐/PET‐ (1.14 CL/year vs. 0.15 CL/year respectively, p <0.001). Plasma+/PET‐ progressors became PET+, on average, 2 years earlier than Plasma‐/PET‐ progressors. Plasma+/PET Low group had faster decline in survival probability than Plasma‐/PET Low (HR: 20.82 [11.28 – 38.42], p <0.001 vs. HR: 6.67 [3.51 – 12.65], p <0.001) (Figure 1B) but this was driven by higher CL in the Plasma+ group. Conclusion Cognitively unimpaired individuals with abnormal plasma Aβ42/40 but negative Aβ‐PET face a significantly increased risk of future positive Aβ‐PET. This provides supporting evidence that brain Aβ pathology can be detected in plasma with IPMS before it is PET‐detectable. Whether this also applies to plasma Aβ42/40 immunoassays warrants investigation.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Edith Cowan University (AU), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Curtin University (AU), Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (AU), Australian e-Health Research Centre (AU), Austin Health (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.