Do Social Interventions Improve Welfare? Evidence From Northern Ghana

ABSTRACT Social protection programs (SPP), including agricultural input subsidies (AIS), have been implemented in Ghana over the past three decades aimed at improving the welfare of low‐income households. This paper examines whether these social interventions improve welfare in Northern Ghana. We utilized a multipurpose survey data collected from 472 farm households and doubly robust treatment effect estimators to address endogeneity. We found that social interventions increase food and non‐food consumption expenditure, reduce food insecurity and poverty likelihood, and finally, increase happiness and resilience. However, the results show considerable heterogeneity in the magnitude of effects across social intervention options and welfare measures. We recommend that the government and development partners should intensify the implementation of social interventions in Northern Ghana to achieve the development outcomes enshrined in the United Nations (UN)'s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and African Union (AU)'s Agenda 2063.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Development Economics
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.70124
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Social Interventions Improve Welfare? Evidence From Northern Ghana

Christian Kwaku Osei, Charles Yaw Okyere, Richmond Atta‐Ankomah, Collins Asante‐Addo
Review of Development Economics
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

Do Social Interventions Improve Welfare? Evidence From Northern Ghana

Christian Kwaku Osei, Charles Yaw Okyere, Richmond Atta‐Ankomah, Collins Asante‐Addo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Social protection programs (SPP), including agricultural input subsidies (AIS), have been implemented in Ghana over the past three decades aimed at improving the welfare of low‐income households. This paper examines whether these social interventions improve welfare in Northern Ghana. We utilized a multipurpose survey data collected from 472 farm households and doubly robust treatment effect estimators to address endogeneity. We found that social interventions increase food and non‐food consumption expenditure, reduce food insecurity and poverty likelihood, and finally, increase happiness and resilience. However, the results show considerable heterogeneity in the magnitude of effects across social intervention options and welfare measures. We recommend that the government and development partners should intensify the implementation of social interventions in Northern Ghana to achieve the development outcomes enshrined in the United Nations (UN)'s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and African Union (AU)'s Agenda 2063.

Review of Development Economics
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Ghana (GH)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.