The Impact of Memory and Anxiety on Choice Consistency

Choice consistency is a fundamental aspect of rational decision-making, reflecting the stability and reliability of preferences. However, real-world decisions frequently exhibit variability and inconsistency, deviating from normative ideals. To elucidate these deviations, this study combined computational modeling, neuroimaging, and behavioral assessments to examine how state anxiety and memory dynamically modulate choice consistency. Remembered food items prompted more consistent and faster choices than forgotten ones, with computational modeling attributing this effect to lower decision thresholds. In contrast, state anxiety-induced via threat-of-shock-impaired both choice consistency and memory retrieval. Intriguingly, anxiety-driven reductions in memory accuracy positively correlated with shorter decision latencies. Neurally, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation during prechoice anticipation predicted choice consistency. Similarly, orbitofrontal cortex engagement during memory retrieval of food stimuli correlated with enhanced memory accuracy. Anxiety dynamically reallocated neural resources, suppressing sensorimotor and memory-related regions while amplifying emotional salience networks. These results suggest that anxiety impairs choice consistency by disrupting memory retrieval processes, which are critical for stabilizing value-based preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.70190
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Memory and Anxiety on Choice Consistency

Jun Wu, Lei Qiao, Manru Guo, Fei Xin et al.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

The Impact of Memory and Anxiety on Choice Consistency

Jun Wu, Lei Qiao, Manru Guo, Fei Xin, Jialuo Lai, Qingfei Chen
article en

Abstract

Choice consistency is a fundamental aspect of rational decision-making, reflecting the stability and reliability of preferences. However, real-world decisions frequently exhibit variability and inconsistency, deviating from normative ideals. To elucidate these deviations, this study combined computational modeling, neuroimaging, and behavioral assessments to examine how state anxiety and memory dynamically modulate choice consistency. Remembered food items prompted more consistent and faster choices than forgotten ones, with computational modeling attributing this effect to lower decision thresholds. In contrast, state anxiety-induced via threat-of-shock-impaired both choice consistency and memory retrieval. Intriguingly, anxiety-driven reductions in memory accuracy positively correlated with shorter decision latencies. Neurally, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation during prechoice anticipation predicted choice consistency. Similarly, orbitofrontal cortex engagement during memory retrieval of food stimuli correlated with enhanced memory accuracy. Anxiety dynamically reallocated neural resources, suppressing sensorimotor and memory-related regions while amplifying emotional salience networks. These results suggest that anxiety impairs choice consistency by disrupting memory retrieval processes, which are critical for stabilizing value-based preferences.

Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesVol. 1556(1)
Shenzhen University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.