Assessment of the content validity of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD): a qualitative study

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a common disorder that can lead to chronic lower back pain (CLBP). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a well-established instrument for diseases of the lumbar spine and lower back pain (LBP), covering pain intensity and pain-related disability. This study evaluated the content validity of the modified electronic ODI among patients with DDD and CLBP in the United States (US). Cognitive interviews were conducted with 12 participants from the US diagnosed with DDD and CLBP using a semi-structured interview guide to assess the comprehension and relevance of the ODI. Concept saturation was achieved by the 12th interview. Twelve participants (mean age 40 years old, standard deviation 11 years) including 11 females provided interpretations of the instructions and for each section that were aligned with the intended meanings (11–12/12, ≥ 92%). Sections were relevant to participants’ experience (11–12/12, ≥ 92%), with the sex life section being less relevant (9/12, 75%). Response options were easy to understand. Participants’ interpretations aligned with response options’ intended meanings in 7/10 sections, with less alignment in the lifting, social life, sex life sections due to perceived similarities in ≥ 2 response options. Participants used different recall periods across sections, which was often related to the absence of experiencing the activity at the time of the interview. Most (7/9, 78%) preferred the use of a one-week recall period. This study confirms the content validity of the ODI in patients with DDD. The ODI with a seven-day recall period would be more appropriate for use in this population to evaluate patient outcomes in a clinical trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09324-1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the content validity of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD): a qualitative study

John H. Powers, Rachel Ballinger, Marie de la Cruz, Andrea De Palma
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Assessment of the content validity of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD): a qualitative study

John H. Powers, Rachel Ballinger, Marie de la Cruz, Andrea De Palma
article en

Abstract

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a common disorder that can lead to chronic lower back pain (CLBP). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a well-established instrument for diseases of the lumbar spine and lower back pain (LBP), covering pain intensity and pain-related disability. This study evaluated the content validity of the modified electronic ODI among patients with DDD and CLBP in the United States (US). Cognitive interviews were conducted with 12 participants from the US diagnosed with DDD and CLBP using a semi-structured interview guide to assess the comprehension and relevance of the ODI. Concept saturation was achieved by the 12th interview. Twelve participants (mean age 40 years old, standard deviation 11 years) including 11 females provided interpretations of the instructions and for each section that were aligned with the intended meanings (11–12/12, ≥ 92%). Sections were relevant to participants’ experience (11–12/12, ≥ 92%), with the sex life section being less relevant (9/12, 75%). Response options were easy to understand. Participants’ interpretations aligned with response options’ intended meanings in 7/10 sections, with less alignment in the lifting, social life, sex life sections due to perceived similarities in ≥ 2 response options. Participants used different recall periods across sections, which was often related to the absence of experiencing the activity at the time of the interview. Most (7/9, 78%) preferred the use of a one-week recall period. This study confirms the content validity of the ODI in patients with DDD. The ODI with a seven-day recall period would be more appropriate for use in this population to evaluate patient outcomes in a clinical trial.

BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersVol. 27(1)
George Washington University (US), Clinical Insights (US), Imperial Consultants (GB), Evidence (Italy) (IT), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.