Accuracy of Visual Atrophy Scales on MRI to predict Mild Dementia in the Cog‐Aging Cohort Study

Abstract Background The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is the most used categorization system for Alzheimer's Disease Dementia (ADD). In clinical practice, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) remains one of the most used methods for differential diagnosis and to improve accuracy, particularly with Visual Atrophy Scales (VAS). Objective To conduct an accuracy analysis of two VAS to predict dementia with CDR1 in an Outpatient Memory Clinic. Methods This is a cross‐sectional study, using data from the Cog‐Aging cohort study from 2019 to 2024. Participants underwent a comprehensive clinical, neuropsychological and neuroimaging assessment to determine CDR scores. Fifty‐two participants had MRI and assessments within 6 months. Participants were divided in Dementia (9) and Non‐Dementia (ND=43) groups. MRIs were assessed by two independent physicians, using The Entorhinal Cortical Atrophy (ERICA) scale and the Medial Temporal Lobe Atrophy (MTA) scale. They scored left and right, leading to an average score and a worst score. CDR Group scores were assessed with Mann‐Whitney. Furtheron, a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was done and cut‐off values were defined by Youden's J statistic. Finally, logistic regression models were done to predict CDR, considering VAS score, age and years of schooling. This study was approved by UFMG Ethics Committee. Results Participants had a mean 76.28 years of age (SD 7.09) and median of 4.5 years of schooling (IQR 7.42). All VAS scores were significantly different between Dementia and ND. All scores had an Area Under the Curve (AUC) >0.715. ERICA average score had the highest AUC 0.792, achieving 88.9% sensitivity and 51% specificity at a cut‐off point of 1.5 and over. Finally, all scores were assessed by logistic regression adjusting for age and years of schooling, and only ERICA score's were significant (table 2). ERICA average score was the best model (Nagelkerke R 2 0.356; p = 0.006) with an Odds‐Ratio of 17.43. Conclusion These findings suggest that ERICA average score was the most accurate method to detect Dementia in this sample, and also represented the best logistic regression model to predict Dementia when adjusted for years of schooling and age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_107397
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of Visual Atrophy Scales on MRI to predict Mild Dementia in the Cog‐Aging Cohort Study

Aline Siqueira de Souza, Bernardo de Mattos Viana, João Henrique Fonseca, Gabriela Tomé Oliveira Engelmann et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Accuracy of Visual Atrophy Scales on MRI to predict Mild Dementia in the Cog‐Aging Cohort Study

Aline Siqueira de Souza, Bernardo de Mattos Viana, João Henrique Fonseca, Gabriela Tomé Oliveira Engelmann, Érika de Oliveira Hansen, Joice Coutinho de Alvarenga, Maria Aparecida Camargos Bicalho, João Ramalho Borges, Giovanna Correia Pereira Moro, Thaise Vallesca Queiroz, Carolina Andrade Koehne, Leticia Xavier Carneiro Calixto, Marco Aurelio Romano‐Silva, Jonas Jardim de Paula
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is the most used categorization system for Alzheimer's Disease Dementia (ADD). In clinical practice, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) remains one of the most used methods for differential diagnosis and to improve accuracy, particularly with Visual Atrophy Scales (VAS). Objective To conduct an accuracy analysis of two VAS to predict dementia with CDR1 in an Outpatient Memory Clinic. Methods This is a cross‐sectional study, using data from the Cog‐Aging cohort study from 2019 to 2024. Participants underwent a comprehensive clinical, neuropsychological and neuroimaging assessment to determine CDR scores. Fifty‐two participants had MRI and assessments within 6 months. Participants were divided in Dementia (9) and Non‐Dementia (ND=43) groups. MRIs were assessed by two independent physicians, using The Entorhinal Cortical Atrophy (ERICA) scale and the Medial Temporal Lobe Atrophy (MTA) scale. They scored left and right, leading to an average score and a worst score. CDR Group scores were assessed with Mann‐Whitney. Furtheron, a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was done and cut‐off values were defined by Youden's J statistic. Finally, logistic regression models were done to predict CDR, considering VAS score, age and years of schooling. This study was approved by UFMG Ethics Committee. Results Participants had a mean 76.28 years of age (SD 7.09) and median of 4.5 years of schooling (IQR 7.42). All VAS scores were significantly different between Dementia and ND. All scores had an Area Under the Curve (AUC) >0.715. ERICA average score had the highest AUC 0.792, achieving 88.9% sensitivity and 51% specificity at a cut‐off point of 1.5 and over. Finally, all scores were assessed by logistic regression adjusting for age and years of schooling, and only ERICA score's were significant (table 2). ERICA average score was the best model (Nagelkerke R 2 0.356; p = 0.006) with an Odds‐Ratio of 17.43. Conclusion These findings suggest that ERICA average score was the most accurate method to detect Dementia in this sample, and also represented the best logistic regression model to predict Dementia when adjusted for years of schooling and age.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.