EEG reveals how space acts as a late heuristic of time

To compensate for its sensory intangibility, humans often rely on spatial metaphors, gestures, and visual tools to represent the passage of time. These spatial tools, i.e. heuristics, range from everyday practices-such as directional hand gestures to indicate past or future events-to more abstract scientific conceptualizations, such as the "curving of space-time" in the theory of relativity. Despite this widespread spatialization of time, it remains unclear to what extent space is an inherent component of the brain's representation of time and its role in monitoring temporal durations. Here, in a combined EEG and behavioral study we have examined this issue by testing a sample of 30 young healthy adult volunteers (mean age: 23.3 y) in a task that required discriminating between short 1 sec. and long 3 sec. time intervals. In a compatible condition, "short" decisions were associated with left-side button presses and "long" decisions with right-side ones. In a incompatible condition the association between time durations and the side of lateral motor responses was reversed. Faster RTs in the compatible vs incompatible condition, i.e. a signature of the spatial representation of time, were only observed at slower RTs. This results point outs that space is a late compensatory mechanism of time representation that is recruited when faster and non-spatial timekeeping mechanisms are suboptimally engaged. EEG analyses reveal a cascade-like process: spatial engagement in timekeeping followed the insufficient non-spatial encoding of time intervals, leading to delayed decisions on their length and slower response selection. Computational models of meta-reinforcement learning suggest that trial-by-trial fluctuations in the speed of RTs and the corresponding spatialization of time durations could be explained by stochastic variations in the activity of the dopaminergic/noradrenergic (DA/NE) system and its interaction with the anterior cingulate cortex. These findings provide the first clear evidence of when, why, and how the brain recruits spatial mechanisms in the service of temporal processing and demonstrate that non-spatial and spatial timekeeping systems can be dissociated at both behavioural and electrophysiological levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeuroImage
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121710
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EEG reveals how space acts as a late heuristic of time

Fabrizio Doricchi, Massimo Silvetti, Stefano Lasaponara, Mário Pinto et al.
NeuroImage
Neuroscience and Music Perception
article

EEG reveals how space acts as a late heuristic of time

Fabrizio Doricchi, Massimo Silvetti, Stefano Lasaponara, Mário Pinto, Silvana Lozito, Sara Lo Presti, Gabriele Scozia, M. C. Pazzaglia
article en

Abstract

To compensate for its sensory intangibility, humans often rely on spatial metaphors, gestures, and visual tools to represent the passage of time. These spatial tools, i.e. heuristics, range from everyday practices-such as directional hand gestures to indicate past or future events-to more abstract scientific conceptualizations, such as the "curving of space-time" in the theory of relativity. Despite this widespread spatialization of time, it remains unclear to what extent space is an inherent component of the brain's representation of time and its role in monitoring temporal durations. Here, in a combined EEG and behavioral study we have examined this issue by testing a sample of 30 young healthy adult volunteers (mean age: 23.3 y) in a task that required discriminating between short 1 sec. and long 3 sec. time intervals. In a compatible condition, "short" decisions were associated with left-side button presses and "long" decisions with right-side ones. In a incompatible condition the association between time durations and the side of lateral motor responses was reversed. Faster RTs in the compatible vs incompatible condition, i.e. a signature of the spatial representation of time, were only observed at slower RTs. This results point outs that space is a late compensatory mechanism of time representation that is recruited when faster and non-spatial timekeeping mechanisms are suboptimally engaged. EEG analyses reveal a cascade-like process: spatial engagement in timekeeping followed the insufficient non-spatial encoding of time intervals, leading to delayed decisions on their length and slower response selection. Computational models of meta-reinforcement learning suggest that trial-by-trial fluctuations in the speed of RTs and the corresponding spatialization of time durations could be explained by stochastic variations in the activity of the dopaminergic/noradrenergic (DA/NE) system and its interaction with the anterior cingulate cortex. These findings provide the first clear evidence of when, why, and how the brain recruits spatial mechanisms in the service of temporal processing and demonstrate that non-spatial and spatial timekeeping systems can be dissociated at both behavioural and electrophysiological levels.

NeuroImageVol. 326
Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT), National Research Council (IT), Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.