Split-key PRFs and Extended Hybrid Security for KEM Combiners

Key encapsulation mechanism (KEM) combiners allow for the construction of hybrid KEMs that are secure as long as at least one of several underlying ingredient KEMs remains secure. In PKC 2018, Giacon, Heuer, and Poettering showed that parallel KEM combiners whose core function is a split-key pseudorandom function (PRF) satisfy IND-CCA security if at least one of the ingredient KEMs satisfies IND-CCA security. However, their result assumes that public keys of the combined KEM are generated independently from any instances of the ingredient KEMs, which may not hold in real-world applications. To address this, we introduce a new security model which captures adversarial access to both the combined KEM and (post-processed versions of) the ingredient KEMs. We show that security in this extended model can still be achieved if at least one ingredient KEM satisfies IND-CCA security, the core function is a split-key PRF, and the ingredient KEM outputs are post-processed using standard PRFs. We consider an application of this approach to hybrid KEMs in the S/MIME secure email standard. We also provide a new construction for a split-key PRF, which uses a t-resilient extractor to output a string of truly random bits from an input in which the adversary controls t bits, and show that this split-key PRF construction is secure in the standard model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IACR Communications in Cryptology
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62056/ah890lmol
Primary Topic
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Split-key PRFs and Extended Hybrid Security for KEM Combiners

Lise Millerjord, Douglas Stebila, Camryn Steckel
IACR Communications in Cryptology
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
article

Split-key PRFs and Extended Hybrid Security for KEM Combiners

Lise Millerjord, Douglas Stebila, Camryn Steckel
article en

Abstract

Key encapsulation mechanism (KEM) combiners allow for the construction of hybrid KEMs that are secure as long as at least one of several underlying ingredient KEMs remains secure. In PKC 2018, Giacon, Heuer, and Poettering showed that parallel KEM combiners whose core function is a split-key pseudorandom function (PRF) satisfy IND-CCA security if at least one of the ingredient KEMs satisfies IND-CCA security. However, their result assumes that public keys of the combined KEM are generated independently from any instances of the ingredient KEMs, which may not hold in real-world applications. To address this, we introduce a new security model which captures adversarial access to both the combined KEM and (post-processed versions of) the ingredient KEMs. We show that security in this extended model can still be achieved if at least one ingredient KEM satisfies IND-CCA security, the core function is a split-key PRF, and the ingredient KEM outputs are post-processed using standard PRFs. We consider an application of this approach to hybrid KEMs in the S/MIME secure email standard. We also provide a new construction for a split-key PRF, which uses a t-resilient extractor to output a string of truly random bits from an input in which the adversary controls t bits, and show that this split-key PRF construction is secure in the standard model.

IACR Communications in CryptologyVol. 2(4)
University of Waterloo (CA), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.