Thermal and Fat Organic Loading Effects on Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Effluents

The untreated discharge of dairy industry wastewater, characterized by high organic and nutrient loads, poses a severe eutrophication threat, leading to oxygen depletion and the disruption of aquatic ecosystems, which necessitates advanced treatment strategies. Anaerobic digestion (AD) represents an effective and sustainable alternative, converting organic matter into biogas while minimizing sludge production and contributing to Circular Economy strategies. This study investigated the effects of fat concentration and operational temperature on the anaerobic digestion of dairy effluents. Three types of effluents, skimmed, semi-skimmed, and whole substrates, were evaluated under mesophilic 35 °C and thermophilic 55 °C conditions to degrade substrates with different fat content. Low-fat effluents exhibited higher COD removal, shorter lag phases, and stable activity under mesophilic conditions, while high-fat substrates delayed start-up due to accumulation of fatty acids and brief methanogen inhibition. Thermophilic digestion accelerated hydrolysis and methane production but demonstrated increased sensitivity to lipid-induced inhibition. Kinetic modeling confirmed that the modified Gompertz model accurately described mesophilic digestion with rapid microbial adaptation, while the Cone model better captured thermophilic, hydrolysis-limited kinetics. The thermophilic operation significantly enhanced methane productivity, yielding 105–191 mL CH4 g−1VS compared to 54–70 mL CH4 g−1VS under mesophilic conditions by increasing apparent hydrolysis rates and reducing lag phases. However, the mesophilic process demonstrated superior operational stability and robustness during start-up with fat-rich effluents, which otherwise suffered delayed methane formation due to lipid hydrolysis and volatile fatty acid (VFA) inhibition. Overall, the synergistic interaction between temperature and fat concentration revealed a trade-off between methane productivity and process stability, with thermophilic digestion increasing methane yields up to 191 mL CH4 g−1 VS but reducing COD removal and robustness during start-up, whereas mesophilic operation ensured more stable performance despite lower methane yields.