In-Person and Virtual Dates are Comparable, But People Don’t Know It

Virtual dating has become popular, but how do people feel about potential romantic partners on virtual versus in-person first dates? In Study 1, a sample of online participants predicted that in-person dates would be markedly better than virtual dates. Study 2 examined whether this prediction received support in a dataset of 4,542 real-life blind dates. We examined first-date outcomes (e.g., date enjoyment and attraction) and partner trait-perceptions (e.g., ambitious and confident) reported after each date. In-person dates were generally longer, but otherwise, virtual and in-person dates were highly similar across the full sample, and virtual dates outperformed in-person dates when controlling for date length. We conducted a one-with-many Social Relations Model analysis on a subsample of Study 2 daters (<i>n</i> = 1,833 dates) and documented a modest amount of actor and partner variance, and a large amount of relationship variance. Virtual dates may be an underappreciated screening strategy for potential partners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251409231
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-Person and Virtual Dates are Comparable, But People Don’t Know It

Kellie Ammerman, Eli Finkel, Elina Moreno, Paul W. Eastwick
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

In-Person and Virtual Dates are Comparable, But People Don’t Know It

Kellie Ammerman, Eli Finkel, Elina Moreno, Paul W. Eastwick
article en

Abstract

Virtual dating has become popular, but how do people feel about potential romantic partners on virtual versus in-person first dates? In Study 1, a sample of online participants predicted that in-person dates would be markedly better than virtual dates. Study 2 examined whether this prediction received support in a dataset of 4,542 real-life blind dates. We examined first-date outcomes (e.g., date enjoyment and attraction) and partner trait-perceptions (e.g., ambitious and confident) reported after each date. In-person dates were generally longer, but otherwise, virtual and in-person dates were highly similar across the full sample, and virtual dates outperformed in-person dates when controlling for date length. We conducted a one-with-many Social Relations Model analysis on a subsample of Study 2 daters (<i>n</i> = 1,833 dates) and documented a modest amount of actor and partner variance, and a large amount of relationship variance. Virtual dates may be an underappreciated screening strategy for potential partners.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (CH), Total (United States) (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

In-Person and Virtual Dates are Comparable, But People Don’t Know It — Kellie Ammerman, Eli Finkel, et al. · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS