Mechanistic basis for 2-aminopurine quenching by morpholine- and piperazine-based Good’s buffers

2-Aminopurine (2AP) is the most widely used fluorescent nucleobase analog in DNA and RNA research. While quenching of 2AP by DNA bases has been extensively characterized, the effect of extrinsic quenchers has received far less attention. This study examines the fluorescence quenching mechanisms of 2AP by commonly used buffers in biochemical research. We systematically investigated four Good's buffers-MES, MOPS, HEPES, and PIPES-along with their parent compounds morpholine and piperazine across a range of pH conditions and concentrations. For morpholine-containing buffers (MES and MOPS), quenching occurs predominantly at pH values at or above their respective pKa values and is negligible at more than two pH units below the pKa. In contrast, piperazine-containing buffers (HEPES and PIPES) exhibit substantial quenching even below their pKa values due to the presence of two basic nitrogen atoms in the piperazine ring, one of which remains unprotonated and reactive across the investigated pH range. Time-resolved fluorescence measurements demonstrate that quenching is primarily dynamic for MES, MOPS, and HEPES, while PIPES shows significant static quenching contributions. Results are consistent with a mechanism involving photoinduced electron transfer from unprotonated tertiary amines to excited-state 2AP. The thermodynamic feasibility of this mechanism is supported by the low oxidation potentials of these tertiary amines compared to primary amine-containing buffers such as TRIS, which does not quench 2AP fluorescence. These results have significant practical implications for fluorescence-based studies using 2AP as a structural or dynamic probe in nucleic acid research. Buffer selection can substantially alter both quantum yields and fluorescence lifetimes of 2AP, potentially leading to misinterpretation of experimental data if these effects are not properly accounted for.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods and Applications in Fluorescence
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2050-6120/ae35d0
Primary Topic
DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanistic basis for 2-aminopurine quenching by morpholine- and piperazine-based Good’s buffers

Marcia Levitus, Souvik Poddar, Benjamin A Glennon
Methods and Applications in Fluorescence
DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
article

Mechanistic basis for 2-aminopurine quenching by morpholine- and piperazine-based Good’s buffers

Marcia Levitus, Souvik Poddar, Benjamin A Glennon
article en

Abstract

2-Aminopurine (2AP) is the most widely used fluorescent nucleobase analog in DNA and RNA research. While quenching of 2AP by DNA bases has been extensively characterized, the effect of extrinsic quenchers has received far less attention. This study examines the fluorescence quenching mechanisms of 2AP by commonly used buffers in biochemical research. We systematically investigated four Good's buffers-MES, MOPS, HEPES, and PIPES-along with their parent compounds morpholine and piperazine across a range of pH conditions and concentrations. For morpholine-containing buffers (MES and MOPS), quenching occurs predominantly at pH values at or above their respective pKa values and is negligible at more than two pH units below the pKa. In contrast, piperazine-containing buffers (HEPES and PIPES) exhibit substantial quenching even below their pKa values due to the presence of two basic nitrogen atoms in the piperazine ring, one of which remains unprotonated and reactive across the investigated pH range. Time-resolved fluorescence measurements demonstrate that quenching is primarily dynamic for MES, MOPS, and HEPES, while PIPES shows significant static quenching contributions. Results are consistent with a mechanism involving photoinduced electron transfer from unprotonated tertiary amines to excited-state 2AP. The thermodynamic feasibility of this mechanism is supported by the low oxidation potentials of these tertiary amines compared to primary amine-containing buffers such as TRIS, which does not quench 2AP fluorescence. These results have significant practical implications for fluorescence-based studies using 2AP as a structural or dynamic probe in nucleic acid research. Buffer selection can substantially alter both quantum yields and fluorescence lifetimes of 2AP, potentially leading to misinterpretation of experimental data if these effects are not properly accounted for.

Methods and Applications in FluorescenceVol. 14(1)
BioMimetic Systems (United States) (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.