Cross‐Sectional Analysis of Plasma GFAP Across Alzheimer's Disease Stages

Abstract Background Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia worldwide, with Late‐Onset Alzheimer's Disease (LOAD) comprising over 90% of cases. Multiple biomarkers are being investigated for their association with pathologies associated with AD including glial acidic fibrillary protein (GFAP). GFAP levels have been observed to increase in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of AD patients, particularly in response to amyloid‐β, before behavioral symptoms appear. This indicates GFAP's utility as an early‐AD biomarker. However, GFAP levels vary significantly between subjects due to various factors, such as demographics or medical comorbidities. To use plasma GFAP levels as an accurate biomarker in AD studies, it is essential to fully understand and identify all potential reasons for variation in its levels. Method The uniform data set (UDS), which contains longitudinal subject data from AD Centers (ADC) was obtained from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC). Total GFAP levels from 23 ADC's were measured by the National Centralized Repository for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (NCRAD) using Quanterix Simoa‐HDx (N4PE and N2PB). Results were log10‐transformed and z‐scored for analysis. A total of 3,456 unique subjects at a single visit, aged 60+, were included in this cross‐sectional analysis. T‐tests, one‐way ANOVAs, Tukey's‐ HSD Post‐Hoc and linear regression were used to examine the association of GFAP levels with diagnosis, pathology, demographics and comorbid conditions. Result Analysis showed that GFAP levels varied significantly ( p ‐value < 0.05) with age in addition to sex, APOE genotype, elevated amyloid PET, hippocampal atrophy, and cognitive status. The non‐demographic associations were not significantly modified when adjusting for the subjects' age despite a significant association of GFAP levels with age overall. Conclusion Plasma GFAP levels differed significantly between males and females, emphasizing the need to account for sex differences in biomarker research. Plasma GFAP levels show strong associations with risk alleles, elevated amyloid PET levels, hippocampal atrophy, and cognitive status, supporting its potential as a biomarker for AD diagnosis. Future efforts will focus on exploring the impact of changes in GFAP on changes in atrophy, cognitive decline, and how these relationships are modified by comorbid conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_106901
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross‐Sectional Analysis of Plasma GFAP Across Alzheimer's Disease Stages

Kristen A. Russ, Yi Fang Zhao, Naazneen Khan, John R. Hoffman et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
article

Cross‐Sectional Analysis of Plasma GFAP Across Alzheimer's Disease Stages

Kristen A. Russ, Yi Fang Zhao, Naazneen Khan, John R. Hoffman, Tatiana M. Foroud, Alex J. Schwefel, Jeffrey L. Dage
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia worldwide, with Late‐Onset Alzheimer's Disease (LOAD) comprising over 90% of cases. Multiple biomarkers are being investigated for their association with pathologies associated with AD including glial acidic fibrillary protein (GFAP). GFAP levels have been observed to increase in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of AD patients, particularly in response to amyloid‐β, before behavioral symptoms appear. This indicates GFAP's utility as an early‐AD biomarker. However, GFAP levels vary significantly between subjects due to various factors, such as demographics or medical comorbidities. To use plasma GFAP levels as an accurate biomarker in AD studies, it is essential to fully understand and identify all potential reasons for variation in its levels. Method The uniform data set (UDS), which contains longitudinal subject data from AD Centers (ADC) was obtained from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC). Total GFAP levels from 23 ADC's were measured by the National Centralized Repository for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (NCRAD) using Quanterix Simoa‐HDx (N4PE and N2PB). Results were log10‐transformed and z‐scored for analysis. A total of 3,456 unique subjects at a single visit, aged 60+, were included in this cross‐sectional analysis. T‐tests, one‐way ANOVAs, Tukey's‐ HSD Post‐Hoc and linear regression were used to examine the association of GFAP levels with diagnosis, pathology, demographics and comorbid conditions. Result Analysis showed that GFAP levels varied significantly ( p ‐value < 0.05) with age in addition to sex, APOE genotype, elevated amyloid PET, hippocampal atrophy, and cognitive status. The non‐demographic associations were not significantly modified when adjusting for the subjects' age despite a significant association of GFAP levels with age overall. Conclusion Plasma GFAP levels differed significantly between males and females, emphasizing the need to account for sex differences in biomarker research. Plasma GFAP levels show strong associations with risk alleles, elevated amyloid PET levels, hippocampal atrophy, and cognitive status, supporting its potential as a biomarker for AD diagnosis. Future efforts will focus on exploring the impact of changes in GFAP on changes in atrophy, cognitive decline, and how these relationships are modified by comorbid conditions.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Indiana University Health (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.