Validation of SOFA-2 score in sepsis and exploration of its extension with additional immune markers

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is central to the diagnosis and management of sepsis, but its recent update has not been specifically evaluated in sepsis. Moreover, it is unknown whether adding immune markers beyond white blood cell (WBC) and lymphocyte counts—excluded in the recent update—could further improve its performance. The present study aimed to validate SOFA-2 in patients with sepsis and to examine its performance following integration of supplementary immune markers. This study is a secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial in adult patients with sepsis conducted in China from September 2016 to December 2020. Both versions of SOFA were re-calculated at randomization, with an XGBoost-derived extension that incorporated additional immune markers, including WBC, lymphocyte counts, monocyte human leucocyte antigen-DR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and percentage of regulatory T cells. The discriminatory performance for predicting intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), was examined. Among the 1089 patients with sepsis (median age 64.5 years; 31.1% female), 9.2% died during ICU stay. The SOFA-2 was lower than the SOFA-1 (median [interquartile range] 6 [4–9] vs . 7 [5–10], P =0.001), primarily due to lower scores in the respiratory, cardiovascular, and liver domains, although higher values were observed in the kidney domain. Using a cut-off of 2, the two scores demonstrated highly concordant distributions; only 2.2% of patients had a SOFA-1 ≥2 but a SOFA-2 <2. The two scores demonstrated comparable discriminatory ability for predicting ICU mortality, with AUCs of 0.646 (95% confidence interval 0.595–0.698) for SOFA-2 and 0.641 (0.587–0.696) for SOFA-1. Incorporating any combination of the five immune markers into SOFA-2 did not result in significant changes in AUC. Updating from SOFA-1 to SOFA-2 results in comparable score distributions and sustains the discriminatory capacity for predicting ICU mortality in patients with sepsis. Immune dysregulation in sepsis may be too complex to capture with simple baseline markers. clinicaltrials.gov NCT02867267.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intensive Medicine
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2025.12.003
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of SOFA-2 score in sepsis and exploration of its extension with additional immune markers

Xiangdong Guan, Yongjun Liu, Yao Nie, Minying Chen et al.
Journal of Intensive Medicine
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Validation of SOFA-2 score in sepsis and exploration of its extension with additional immune markers

Xiangdong Guan, Yongjun Liu, Yao Nie, Minying Chen, F. Pei, Qingui Chen, Bin Gu, Zimeng Liu, Guangzhen Li, Jianfeng Wu
article en

Abstract

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is central to the diagnosis and management of sepsis, but its recent update has not been specifically evaluated in sepsis. Moreover, it is unknown whether adding immune markers beyond white blood cell (WBC) and lymphocyte counts—excluded in the recent update—could further improve its performance. The present study aimed to validate SOFA-2 in patients with sepsis and to examine its performance following integration of supplementary immune markers. This study is a secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial in adult patients with sepsis conducted in China from September 2016 to December 2020. Both versions of SOFA were re-calculated at randomization, with an XGBoost-derived extension that incorporated additional immune markers, including WBC, lymphocyte counts, monocyte human leucocyte antigen-DR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and percentage of regulatory T cells. The discriminatory performance for predicting intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), was examined. Among the 1089 patients with sepsis (median age 64.5 years; 31.1% female), 9.2% died during ICU stay. The SOFA-2 was lower than the SOFA-1 (median [interquartile range] 6 [4–9] vs . 7 [5–10], P =0.001), primarily due to lower scores in the respiratory, cardiovascular, and liver domains, although higher values were observed in the kidney domain. Using a cut-off of 2, the two scores demonstrated highly concordant distributions; only 2.2% of patients had a SOFA-1 ≥2 but a SOFA-2 <2. The two scores demonstrated comparable discriminatory ability for predicting ICU mortality, with AUCs of 0.646 (95% confidence interval 0.595–0.698) for SOFA-2 and 0.641 (0.587–0.696) for SOFA-1. Incorporating any combination of the five immune markers into SOFA-2 did not result in significant changes in AUC. Updating from SOFA-1 to SOFA-2 results in comparable score distributions and sustains the discriminatory capacity for predicting ICU mortality in patients with sepsis. Immune dysregulation in sepsis may be too complex to capture with simple baseline markers. clinicaltrials.gov NCT02867267.

Journal of Intensive Medicine
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Shanghai Clinical Research Center (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.