<i>Ab initio</i> calculation of atomic solid hydrogen phases based on Gutzwiller many-body wave functions

We apply two<i>ab initio</i>many-body methods based on Gutzwiller wave functions, i.e., correlation matrix renormalization theory (CMRT) and Gutzwiller conjugate gradient minimization (GCGM), to the study of crystalline phases of atomic hydrogen. Both methods avoid empirical Hubbard<i>U</i>parameters and are free from double-counting issues. CMRT employs a Gutzwiller-type approximation that enables efficient calculations, while GCGM goes beyond this approximation to achieve higher accuracy at higher computational cost. By benchmarking against available quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) results, we demonstrate that while both methods are more accurate than the widely used density-functional theory, GCGM systematically captures additional correlation energy missing in CMRT, leading to significantly improved total energy predictions. We also show that by including the correlation energyEcfrom local density approximation in the CMRT calculation, CMRT +Ecproduces energy in better agreement with the QMC results in these hydrogen lattice systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648x/ae35b7
Primary Topic
Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ab initio calculation of atomic solid hydrogen phases based on Gutzwiller many-body wave functions

Zhuo Ye, Jun Liu, Cai-Zhuang Wang, Kai-Ming Ho et al.
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
article

Ab initio calculation of atomic solid hydrogen phases based on Gutzwiller many-body wave functions

Zhuo Ye, Jun Liu, Cai-Zhuang Wang, Kai-Ming Ho, Feng Zhang, Yong-Xin Yao
article en

Abstract

We apply two<i>ab initio</i>many-body methods based on Gutzwiller wave functions, i.e., correlation matrix renormalization theory (CMRT) and Gutzwiller conjugate gradient minimization (GCGM), to the study of crystalline phases of atomic hydrogen. Both methods avoid empirical Hubbard<i>U</i>parameters and are free from double-counting issues. CMRT employs a Gutzwiller-type approximation that enables efficient calculations, while GCGM goes beyond this approximation to achieve higher accuracy at higher computational cost. By benchmarking against available quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) results, we demonstrate that while both methods are more accurate than the widely used density-functional theory, GCGM systematically captures additional correlation energy missing in CMRT, leading to significantly improved total energy predictions. We also show that by including the correlation energyEcfrom local density approximation in the CMRT calculation, CMRT +Ecproduces energy in better agreement with the QMC results in these hydrogen lattice systems.

Journal of Physics Condensed MatterVol. 38(4)
Iowa State University (US), Ames National Laboratory (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.