BrainAge moderates associations between AD biomarkers and cognitive decline: findings from A4/LEARN and the Harvard Aging Brain Study

Abstract Background BrainAge models estimate biological brain age based on neuroimaging data, providing a measure of brain health. This metric is particularly relevant in Alzheimer's disease (AD), where accelerated brain aging is exacerbated by β‐amyloid (Aβ) and tau accumulation. We investigated the extent to which BrainAge moderates associations between AD biomarkers and longitudinal cognitive decline across two independent cohorts. Methods We examined 1690 participants from A4/LEARN and 349 from HABS (Table 1). Using the Open‐Source tool AgeML within each cohort, we built a BrainAge linear regressor model with 5‐fold cross validation using MRI‐T1 volumetric and FreeSurfer cortical thickness ROIs. We compared predicted ages with chronological age to create a BrainAge delta . To avoid regressing out sex and APOEε 4 variance, separate male/female models were built with data from APOEε 4 non‐carriers and applied to each cohort. We examined BrainAge delta as a moderator of global neocortical Aβ‐PET burden, temporal lobe Tau PET composite and p ‐tau 217 associations with longitudinal PACC using linear mixed effects models. We adjusted for random intercepts and slopes, and baseline age, sex, years of education and APOEε 4. In A4/LEARN we additionally adjusted for cumulative dose and treatment group using a spline model. Results Higher levels of Aβ‐PET, Tau‐PET and p ‐tau 217 at baseline was significantly correlated with higher BrainAge delta (worse) (Figure 1). BrainAge delta was directly associated with PACC trajectories in both cohorts. It also moderated the association between Aβ and Tau‐PET and PACC trajectories such that higher BrainAge delta was associated with faster cognitive decline with increasing levels of each biomarker. We found the same pattern of effects in p ‐tau 217 limited only to the A4/LEARN sample but was trend‐level in HABS (Figure 2). Conclusions BrainAge delta is significantly associated with Aβ and tau burden and moderates their association with cognitive decline, supporting previous literature suggesting that BrainAge is a robust marker of brain health. Prioritizing individuals with worse BrainAge for clinical trials could not only effectively reduce screen fails (estimates forthcoming) but is a potentially feasible approach given that it can be calculated from a single T1‐weighted MRI scan. These findings also highlight the importance of age‐independent neurodegeneration patterns to contribute unique signal in models of brain health and pathological progression.