A MultiRater MultiOrgan Abdominal CT Dataset for Calibration Analysis and Uncertainty Modeling in Segmentation

In medical imaging, deep learning (DL) models often struggle to delineate ambiguous structures such as tumors or organ boundaries, leading to uncertainty in defining precise contours. This challenge is amplified by inter-rater variability, where experts may disagree on boundary delineations, resulting in inconsistent segmentation outcomes. Addressing these issues requires robust algorithms capable of quantifying uncertainty, standardizing annotation practices, and improving calibration to ensure reliable predictions, particularly in multi-class and multi-rater scenarios. When models are miscalibrated and overconfident, their outputs can mislead clinical decision-making, potentially influencing radiologists to over- or under-estimate malignancy risks. The CURVAS challenge (Calibration and Uncertainty for multiRater Volume Assessment in multiorgan Segmentation) was established to address these challenges by jointly assessing uncertainty, calibration, and segmentation quality, as well as promoting clinical relevance by evaluating organ volumes while accounting for annotation variability. To support this, a dataset of 90 contrast-enhanced CT scans from University Hospital Erlangen was curated, containing pancreas, liver, and kidney segmentations annotated by three experts. This resource provides a foundation for developing and benchmarking algorithms that balance segmentation accuracy, calibration, and reliability. A quantitative analysis of the annotations shows that kidney and liver segmentations exhibit strong consistency, whereas the pancreas remains challenging, emphasizing the need for refined labeling protocols and improved training strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Data
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-06473-9
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A MultiRater MultiOrgan Abdominal CT Dataset for Calibration Analysis and Uncertainty Modeling in Segmentation

Anton Aubanell, Andreu Morillas i Antolín, Meritxell Riera-Marín, Juan Moreno-Vedia et al.
Scientific Data
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

A MultiRater MultiOrgan Abdominal CT Dataset for Calibration Analysis and Uncertainty Modeling in Segmentation

Anton Aubanell, Andreu Morillas i Antolín, Meritxell Riera-Marín, Juan Moreno-Vedia, Matthias May, Adrian Galdran, Javier Garcia-Lopez, Julia Rodriguez-Comas, Joy-Marie Kleiss, Sikha O. K
article en

Abstract

In medical imaging, deep learning (DL) models often struggle to delineate ambiguous structures such as tumors or organ boundaries, leading to uncertainty in defining precise contours. This challenge is amplified by inter-rater variability, where experts may disagree on boundary delineations, resulting in inconsistent segmentation outcomes. Addressing these issues requires robust algorithms capable of quantifying uncertainty, standardizing annotation practices, and improving calibration to ensure reliable predictions, particularly in multi-class and multi-rater scenarios. When models are miscalibrated and overconfident, their outputs can mislead clinical decision-making, potentially influencing radiologists to over- or under-estimate malignancy risks. The CURVAS challenge (Calibration and Uncertainty for multiRater Volume Assessment in multiorgan Segmentation) was established to address these challenges by jointly assessing uncertainty, calibration, and segmentation quality, as well as promoting clinical relevance by evaluating organ volumes while accounting for annotation variability. To support this, a dataset of 90 contrast-enhanced CT scans from University Hospital Erlangen was curated, containing pancreas, liver, and kidney segmentations annotated by three experts. This resource provides a foundation for developing and benchmarking algorithms that balance segmentation accuracy, calibration, and reliability. A quantitative analysis of the annotations shows that kidney and liver segmentations exhibit strong consistency, whereas the pancreas remains challenging, emphasizing the need for refined labeling protocols and improved training strategies.

Scientific DataVol. 13(1)
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), Euskadiko Parke Teknologikoa (ES), Institute of Scientific and Technical Information (CN), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES), Tecnalia (ES), Department of Physiological Sciences (RU), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Eurostars
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.