METHOD FOR ENHANCING FMECA (XMECA) SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES CONSIDERING THE CRITICALITY OF ASSUMPTIONS AND ANALYSIS ERRORS

In existing studies that discuss the Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA, XMECA) method, two principal limiting factors are commonly identified: the significant influence of engineers’ and auditors’ experience on the resulting safety assessments, and the presence of restrictive assumptions embedded in assessment procedures and supporting tools. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a method for enhancing FMECA (XMECA) safety assessment procedures that explicitly accounts for the criticality of underlying assumptions and analysis errors. Case study of applying the proposed method demonstrate that it can serve as an effective instrument for researchers and developers working on reliability and safety assessment problems in critical systems. Further research is devoted to application of the method in different contexts and industrial sectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Systems and Information Technologies
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31891/csit-2025-4-10
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

METHOD FOR ENHANCING FMECA (XMECA) SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES CONSIDERING THE CRITICALITY OF ASSUMPTIONS AND ANALYSIS ERRORS

Ievgen Babeshko, Kharchenko Vyacheslav, Kostiantyn LEONTIIEV
Computer Systems and Information Technologies
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

METHOD FOR ENHANCING FMECA (XMECA) SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES CONSIDERING THE CRITICALITY OF ASSUMPTIONS AND ANALYSIS ERRORS

Ievgen Babeshko, Kharchenko Vyacheslav, Kostiantyn LEONTIIEV
article en

Abstract

In existing studies that discuss the Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA, XMECA) method, two principal limiting factors are commonly identified: the significant influence of engineers’ and auditors’ experience on the resulting safety assessments, and the presence of restrictive assumptions embedded in assessment procedures and supporting tools. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a method for enhancing FMECA (XMECA) safety assessment procedures that explicitly accounts for the criticality of underlying assumptions and analysis errors. Case study of applying the proposed method demonstrate that it can serve as an effective instrument for researchers and developers working on reliability and safety assessment problems in critical systems. Further research is devoted to application of the method in different contexts and industrial sectors.

Computer Systems and Information Technologies(4)
National Aerospace University – Kharkiv Aviation Institute (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

METHOD FOR ENHANCING FMECA (XMECA) SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES CONSIDERING THE CRITICALITY OF ASSUMPTIONS AND ANALYSIS ERRORS — Ievgen Babeshko, Kharchenko Vyacheslav, et al. · Computer Systems and Information Technologies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS