Machine Learning-Based Automatic Diagnosis of Osteoporosis Using Bone Mineral Density Measurements

<b>Background:</b> Osteoporosis and osteopenia are prevalent bone diseases characterized by reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and an increased risk of fractures, particularly in postmenopausal women. While dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains the gold standard for diagnosis, it has limitations regarding accessibility, cost, and predictive capacity for fracture risk. Machine learning (ML) approaches offer an opportunity to develop automated and more accurate diagnostic models by incorporating both BMD values and clinical variables. <b>Method:</b> This study retrospectively analyzed BMD data from 142 postmenopausal women, classified into 3 diagnostic groups: normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis. Various supervised ML algorithms-including Support Vector Machines (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), Decision Trees (DT), Naive Bayes (NB), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)-were applied. Feature selection techniques such as ANOVA, CHI2, MRMR, and Kruskal-Wallis were used to enhance model performance, reduce dimensionality, and improve interpretability. Model performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation based on accuracy, true positive rate (TPR), false negative rate (FNR), and AUC values. <b>Results:</b> Among all models and feature selection combinations, SVM with ANOVA-selected features achieved the highest classification accuracy (94.30%) and 100% TPR for the normal class. Feature sets based on traditional diagnostic regions (L1-L4, femoral neck, total femur) also showed high accuracy (up to 90.70%) but were generally outperformed by statistically selected features. CHI2 and MRMR methods also yielded robust results, particularly when paired with SVM and k-NN classifiers. The results highlight the effectiveness of combining statistical feature selection with ML to enhance diagnostic precision for osteoporosis and osteopenia. <b>Conclusions:</b> Machine learning algorithms, when integrated with data-driven feature selection strategies, provide a promising framework for automated classification of osteoporosis and osteopenia based on BMD data. ANOVA emerged as the most effective feature selection method, yielding superior accuracy across all classifiers. These findings support the integration of ML-based decision support tools into clinical workflows to facilitate early diagnosis and personalized treatment planning. Future studies should explore more diverse and larger datasets, incorporating genetic, lifestyle, and hormonal factors for further model enhancement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020549
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
39.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Based Automatic Diagnosis of Osteoporosis Using Bone Mineral Density Measurements

Levent Uğur, Erol Öten, Mustafa Çapraz, Nilüfer Aygün Bilecik
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Bone health and osteoporosis research
39.58
article

Machine Learning-Based Automatic Diagnosis of Osteoporosis Using Bone Mineral Density Measurements

Levent Uğur, Erol Öten, Mustafa Çapraz, Nilüfer Aygün Bilecik
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Osteoporosis and osteopenia are prevalent bone diseases characterized by reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and an increased risk of fractures, particularly in postmenopausal women. While dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains the gold standard for diagnosis, it has limitations regarding accessibility, cost, and predictive capacity for fracture risk. Machine learning (ML) approaches offer an opportunity to develop automated and more accurate diagnostic models by incorporating both BMD values and clinical variables. <b>Method:</b> This study retrospectively analyzed BMD data from 142 postmenopausal women, classified into 3 diagnostic groups: normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis. Various supervised ML algorithms-including Support Vector Machines (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), Decision Trees (DT), Naive Bayes (NB), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)-were applied. Feature selection techniques such as ANOVA, CHI2, MRMR, and Kruskal-Wallis were used to enhance model performance, reduce dimensionality, and improve interpretability. Model performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation based on accuracy, true positive rate (TPR), false negative rate (FNR), and AUC values. <b>Results:</b> Among all models and feature selection combinations, SVM with ANOVA-selected features achieved the highest classification accuracy (94.30%) and 100% TPR for the normal class. Feature sets based on traditional diagnostic regions (L1-L4, femoral neck, total femur) also showed high accuracy (up to 90.70%) but were generally outperformed by statistically selected features. CHI2 and MRMR methods also yielded robust results, particularly when paired with SVM and k-NN classifiers. The results highlight the effectiveness of combining statistical feature selection with ML to enhance diagnostic precision for osteoporosis and osteopenia. <b>Conclusions:</b> Machine learning algorithms, when integrated with data-driven feature selection strategies, provide a promising framework for automated classification of osteoporosis and osteopenia based on BMD data. ANOVA emerged as the most effective feature selection method, yielding superior accuracy across all classifiers. These findings support the integration of ML-based decision support tools into clinical workflows to facilitate early diagnosis and personalized treatment planning. Future studies should explore more diverse and larger datasets, incorporating genetic, lifestyle, and hormonal factors for further model enhancement.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(2)
Amasya Üniversitesi (TR)
Amasya Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
39.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.