Correction: Comparing the ability of the IAT and of the SC-IAT to account for behavioral outcomes: a re-analysis using linear mixed-effects models

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1764815
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction: Comparing the ability of the IAT and of the SC-IAT to account for behavioral outcomes: a re-analysis using linear mixed-effects models

Ottavia M. Epifania, Egidio Robusto
Frontiers in Psychology
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Correction: Comparing the ability of the IAT and of the SC-IAT to account for behavioral outcomes: a re-analysis using linear mixed-effects models

Ottavia M. Epifania, Egidio Robusto
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
University of Padua (IT), University of Trento (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Correction: Comparing the ability of the IAT and of the SC-IAT to account for behavioral outcomes: a re-analysis using linear mixed-effects models — Ottavia M. Epifania, Egidio Robusto · Frontiers in Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS