Effectiveness and the patient experience with vortioxetine vs other standard-of-care antidepressants in major depressive disorder: Real-world insights from an observational, prospective, decentralized study using the PatientsLikeMe platform

• Qualitative usability tests show need for accessible support interfaces like PLM • Vortioxetine or other SOC AD led to similar proportions with PGI-I <2 at week 12 • Higher remission rates observed with long-term vortioxetine compared with other SOC • Greater improvement in well-being and life satisfaction seen in vortioxetine cohort • Most decentralized study participants tracked goals, remained engaged for 6 months Major depressive disorder (MDD) remains a clinical challenge, showing low remission rates with standard-of-care (SOC) antidepressants (ADs). This study evaluated real-world treatment experience with vortioxetine versus SOC ADs through the online peer community PatientsLikeMe (PLM). This observational, prospective, patient-centric, decentralized study recruited adults with MDD using the PLM platform. In this 2-part study, qualitative surveys informed study flow. The quantitative study enrolled participants who started or switched SOC AD monotherapy or vortioxetine within 180 days and had baseline Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores ≥5. Primary endpoint was proportion with Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score <2 at week 12 (W12). Secondary endpoints included MDD severity, MDD symptoms, and quality of life (QOL). Qualitative survey responses refined the quantitative study design. Quantitative study enrolled 352 receiving SOC and 151 receiving vortioxetine. At W12, proportions with PGI-I scores <2 were similar (vortioxetine vs SOC: 4.5% vs 1.8%; P =0.830). Mean PGI-I scores were similar at W12 (vortioxetine vs SOC: 3.5 vs 3.6; P =0.831) and lower with vortioxetine at W24 (vortioxetine vs SOC: 3.0 vs 3.4; P <0.001). Remission rates at W24 were higher with vortioxetine (11.4%) vs SOC (2.5%; P <0.001). Feelings of anhedonia were significantly less frequent with vortioxetine ( P =0.005). Self-reported data may introduce recall bias. PLM users may have higher health literacy than the general population. Although primary endpoint was not met, long-term vortioxetine was associated with improved global impression, QOL, and life satisfaction, and a higher rate of remission, which can guide clinical decisions and empower patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2025.101019
Primary Topic
Treatment of Major Depression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness and the patient experience with vortioxetine vs other standard-of-care antidepressants in major depressive disorder: Real-world insights from an observational, prospective, decentralized study using the PatientsLikeMe platform

Maggie McCue, Sagar V. Parikh, Alina Karim, Chris Blair et al.
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Treatment of Major Depression
article

Effectiveness and the patient experience with vortioxetine vs other standard-of-care antidepressants in major depressive disorder: Real-world insights from an observational, prospective, decentralized study using the PatientsLikeMe platform

Maggie McCue, Sagar V. Parikh, Alina Karim, Chris Blair, Mark Opler, Priscilla Driscoll Shempp, Ian Robinson, Michael Martin, Roger S. McIntyre, Mary C. Burke, Jeoffrey Bispham
article en

Abstract

• Qualitative usability tests show need for accessible support interfaces like PLM • Vortioxetine or other SOC AD led to similar proportions with PGI-I <2 at week 12 • Higher remission rates observed with long-term vortioxetine compared with other SOC • Greater improvement in well-being and life satisfaction seen in vortioxetine cohort • Most decentralized study participants tracked goals, remained engaged for 6 months Major depressive disorder (MDD) remains a clinical challenge, showing low remission rates with standard-of-care (SOC) antidepressants (ADs). This study evaluated real-world treatment experience with vortioxetine versus SOC ADs through the online peer community PatientsLikeMe (PLM). This observational, prospective, patient-centric, decentralized study recruited adults with MDD using the PLM platform. In this 2-part study, qualitative surveys informed study flow. The quantitative study enrolled participants who started or switched SOC AD monotherapy or vortioxetine within 180 days and had baseline Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores ≥5. Primary endpoint was proportion with Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score <2 at week 12 (W12). Secondary endpoints included MDD severity, MDD symptoms, and quality of life (QOL). Qualitative survey responses refined the quantitative study design. Quantitative study enrolled 352 receiving SOC and 151 receiving vortioxetine. At W12, proportions with PGI-I scores <2 were similar (vortioxetine vs SOC: 4.5% vs 1.8%; P =0.830). Mean PGI-I scores were similar at W12 (vortioxetine vs SOC: 3.5 vs 3.6; P =0.831) and lower with vortioxetine at W24 (vortioxetine vs SOC: 3.0 vs 3.4; P <0.001). Remission rates at W24 were higher with vortioxetine (11.4%) vs SOC (2.5%; P <0.001). Feelings of anhedonia were significantly less frequent with vortioxetine ( P =0.005). Self-reported data may introduce recall bias. PLM users may have higher health literacy than the general population. Although primary endpoint was not met, long-term vortioxetine was associated with improved global impression, QOL, and life satisfaction, and a higher rate of remission, which can guide clinical decisions and empower patients.

Journal of Affective Disorders ReportsVol. 24
Clarion University (US), University of Toronto (CA), University of Michigan (US), Michigan Medicine (US), PatientsLikeMe (United States) (US), Takeda (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Treatment of Major Depression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.