Binding Security of Explicitly-Rejecting KEMs via Plaintext Confirmation and Robust PKEs

We analyse the binding properties of explicitly-rejecting key-encapsulation mechanisms (KEMs) obtained by the Fujisaki-Okamoto (FO) transform. The framework for binding notions, introduced by [CDM24], generalises robustness and collision-freeness, and was motivated by the discovery of new types of attacks against KEMs. Implicitly-rejecting FO-KEMs have already been analysed with regards to the binding notions, with [KSW25b] providing the full picture. Binding notions for explicitly-rejecting FO-KEMs have been examined only partially, leaving several gaps. Moreover, the analysis of the explicit-rejection setting must account for additional binding notions that implicitly-rejecting KEMs cannot satisfy. We give mostly positive results for the explicitly-rejecting FO transform—though many notions require further robustness assumptions on the underlying PKE. We then show that the explicit FO transform with plaintext confirmation hash (HFO) achieves all notions and requires weaker robustness assumptions. Finally, we introduce a slightly modified version of the HFO transform that achieves all binding notions without requiring any robustness of the underlying PKE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IACR Communications in Cryptology
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62056/anudvurzn
Primary Topic
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Binding Security of Explicitly-Rejecting KEMs via Plaintext Confirmation and Robust PKEs

Juliane Krämer, Maximiliane Weishäupl, Patrick Struck, Yannick Münz
IACR Communications in Cryptology
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
article

Binding Security of Explicitly-Rejecting KEMs via Plaintext Confirmation and Robust PKEs

Juliane Krämer, Maximiliane Weishäupl, Patrick Struck, Yannick Münz
article en

Abstract

We analyse the binding properties of explicitly-rejecting key-encapsulation mechanisms (KEMs) obtained by the Fujisaki-Okamoto (FO) transform. The framework for binding notions, introduced by [CDM24], generalises robustness and collision-freeness, and was motivated by the discovery of new types of attacks against KEMs. Implicitly-rejecting FO-KEMs have already been analysed with regards to the binding notions, with [KSW25b] providing the full picture. Binding notions for explicitly-rejecting FO-KEMs have been examined only partially, leaving several gaps. Moreover, the analysis of the explicit-rejection setting must account for additional binding notions that implicitly-rejecting KEMs cannot satisfy. We give mostly positive results for the explicitly-rejecting FO transform—though many notions require further robustness assumptions on the underlying PKE. We then show that the explicit FO transform with plaintext confirmation hash (HFO) achieves all notions and requires weaker robustness assumptions. Finally, we introduce a slightly modified version of the HFO transform that achieves all binding notions without requiring any robustness of the underlying PKE.

IACR Communications in CryptologyVol. 2(4)
University of Konstanz (DE), University of Regensburg (DE)
Hector Stiftung, Hector Stiftung II
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Binding Security of Explicitly-Rejecting KEMs via Plaintext Confirmation and Robust PKEs — Juliane Krämer, Maximiliane Weishäupl, et al. · IACR Communications in Cryptology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS