Menstrual cycle phases affect recovery more than performance in trained cyclists

This study investigated the influence of menstrual cycle (MC) phases on psychophysiological responses and recovery following high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in trained female cyclists. Ten eumenorrheic cyclists visited the laboratory 5 times. The first visit took place during the early folicular phase, when participants were bleeding, they completed an incremental test and familiarized with HIIT. The remaining four visits were divided into two sets of consecutive-day sessions, late folicular phase (LFP), between the period of menstrual pause and before ovulation, or late luteal phase (LLP) one week after ovulation. On HIIT sessions, participants answered total quality of recovery (TQR) and Well-being, performed a 3-min test pre- and post-HIIT. The perception of exertion effort (RPE) was related during the HIIT too. On time trial test (TT) sessions, participants answered TQR and Well-being and performed a 20-km TT. Absolute power output during HIIT was similar between MC phases; however, when normalized by the critical power (CP), relative to critical power (%CP) was higher in LFP (p < 0.05). Mean heart rate (HR) and %HR did not differ. There was no between phase and within-session difference in CP. Time to complete the TT was shorter during LFP. There was a large effect size in TQR in HIIT-LFP compared to HIIT-LLP (1.00) and in TT-LFP compared to TT-LLP (0.89). TQR was higher in LFP compared to LLP (p < 0.05) during the HIIT and TT. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that the MC phase has minimal diferences in performance (%CP), no difference in short-term recovery but has impaired performance in 24-h recovery in LLP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251407281
Primary Topic
Exercise and Physiological Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Menstrual cycle phases affect recovery more than performance in trained cyclists

Isabella Righi, Renato Barroso
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Exercise and Physiological Responses
article

Menstrual cycle phases affect recovery more than performance in trained cyclists

Isabella Righi, Renato Barroso
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of menstrual cycle (MC) phases on psychophysiological responses and recovery following high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in trained female cyclists. Ten eumenorrheic cyclists visited the laboratory 5 times. The first visit took place during the early folicular phase, when participants were bleeding, they completed an incremental test and familiarized with HIIT. The remaining four visits were divided into two sets of consecutive-day sessions, late folicular phase (LFP), between the period of menstrual pause and before ovulation, or late luteal phase (LLP) one week after ovulation. On HIIT sessions, participants answered total quality of recovery (TQR) and Well-being, performed a 3-min test pre- and post-HIIT. The perception of exertion effort (RPE) was related during the HIIT too. On time trial test (TT) sessions, participants answered TQR and Well-being and performed a 20-km TT. Absolute power output during HIIT was similar between MC phases; however, when normalized by the critical power (CP), relative to critical power (%CP) was higher in LFP (p < 0.05). Mean heart rate (HR) and %HR did not differ. There was no between phase and within-session difference in CP. Time to complete the TT was shorter during LFP. There was a large effect size in TQR in HIIT-LFP compared to HIIT-LLP (1.00) and in TT-LFP compared to TT-LLP (0.89). TQR was higher in LFP compared to LLP (p < 0.05) during the HIIT and TT. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that the MC phase has minimal diferences in performance (%CP), no difference in short-term recovery but has impaired performance in 24-h recovery in LLP.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Exercise and Physiological Responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.