The Resilience of Complex Sociotechnical Systems: A Meta-Review of Conceptualisations

This meta-review systematically examines 88 review papers from the scientific literature, focusing on the diverse ways scholars define and conceptualise the resilience of complex sociotechnical systems (STS). Among the 484 different conceptualisations identified in the reviews, we observe recurring patterns based on their semantics. In particular, four constructs are predominant: some positive elements, some negative events, specific actions, and some constraints on these actions. Our analysis involves a meticulous categorisation and synthesis of these findings, revealing underlying convergences in the academic discourse on STS resilience. Despite what seemed to be apparent disagreements among scholars in the last decade, our study shows that many differing viewpoints are actually complementary, representing varied expressions of similar underlying principles converging towards a large consensus. This comprehensive synthesis offers a unique perspective on the field of STS resilience, demonstrating the feasibility of moving from diverse meta-theoretical paradigms towards a more unified paradigmatic approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14010071
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Resilience of Complex Sociotechnical Systems: A Meta-Review of Conceptualisations

Matthieu Vert, Alexei Sharpanskykh
Systems
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
article

The Resilience of Complex Sociotechnical Systems: A Meta-Review of Conceptualisations

Matthieu Vert, Alexei Sharpanskykh
article en

Abstract

This meta-review systematically examines 88 review papers from the scientific literature, focusing on the diverse ways scholars define and conceptualise the resilience of complex sociotechnical systems (STS). Among the 484 different conceptualisations identified in the reviews, we observe recurring patterns based on their semantics. In particular, four constructs are predominant: some positive elements, some negative events, specific actions, and some constraints on these actions. Our analysis involves a meticulous categorisation and synthesis of these findings, revealing underlying convergences in the academic discourse on STS resilience. Despite what seemed to be apparent disagreements among scholars in the last decade, our study shows that many differing viewpoints are actually complementary, representing varied expressions of similar underlying principles converging towards a large consensus. This comprehensive synthesis offers a unique perspective on the field of STS resilience, demonstrating the feasibility of moving from diverse meta-theoretical paradigms towards a more unified paradigmatic approach.

SystemsVol. 14(1)
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Resilience of Complex Sociotechnical Systems: A Meta-Review of Conceptualisations — Matthieu Vert, Alexei Sharpanskykh · Systems (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS