Strategies for marking tense and aspect in Tiv

This article examines the realisation of tense and aspect (TA) in Tiv, a Bantoid language spoken in Nigeria. Tense and Aspect distinctions are marked through a combination of morphological parameters, including subject prefix tone, vowel alternation, inflectional suffix choice and tonal suffixes on the verb stem. The study employed a qualitative research approach, and data were collected through eliciting verbal paradigms, document review and oral interviews. The data were analysed, used in sentence construction and linearly glossed using the Leipzig glossing rules. The findings suggest that, while Tiv marks tense morphologically and periphrastically, the present tense lacks overt markers and often overlaps with the progressive aspect, creating analytical challenges. Aspect in Tiv is divided into the perfective and imperfective; the imperfective is further divided into the habitual and progressive. Additionally, there is a fine line between what constitutes the present and the progressive in Tiv. The study argues that although general principles for TA encoding in Bantu languages exist, Tiv demonstrates that such principles are not universally applicable. The language’s unique grammatical patterns underscore the importance of fine-grained, language-specific analysis in typological studies of tense–aspect (TA) systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Arts and Humanities
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2609254
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies for marking tense and aspect in Tiv

Julius Taji, Ignatius Iornenge Usar
Cogent Arts and Humanities
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Strategies for marking tense and aspect in Tiv

Julius Taji, Ignatius Iornenge Usar
article en

Abstract

This article examines the realisation of tense and aspect (TA) in Tiv, a Bantoid language spoken in Nigeria. Tense and Aspect distinctions are marked through a combination of morphological parameters, including subject prefix tone, vowel alternation, inflectional suffix choice and tonal suffixes on the verb stem. The study employed a qualitative research approach, and data were collected through eliciting verbal paradigms, document review and oral interviews. The data were analysed, used in sentence construction and linearly glossed using the Leipzig glossing rules. The findings suggest that, while Tiv marks tense morphologically and periphrastically, the present tense lacks overt markers and often overlaps with the progressive aspect, creating analytical challenges. Aspect in Tiv is divided into the perfective and imperfective; the imperfective is further divided into the habitual and progressive. Additionally, there is a fine line between what constitutes the present and the progressive in Tiv. The study argues that although general principles for TA encoding in Bantu languages exist, Tiv demonstrates that such principles are not universally applicable. The language’s unique grammatical patterns underscore the importance of fine-grained, language-specific analysis in typological studies of tense–aspect (TA) systems.

Cogent Arts and HumanitiesVol. 13(1)
Center for Applied Linguistics (US), University of Dar es Salaam (TZ)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strategies for marking tense and aspect in Tiv — Julius Taji, Ignatius Iornenge Usar · Cogent Arts and Humanities (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS