Land surface model underperformance tied to specific meteorological conditions

Abstract. The exchange of carbon, water, and energy fluxes between the land and the atmosphere plays a vital role in shaping global change and extreme events. Yet our understanding of the theory of this surface-atmosphere exchange, represented via land surface models (LSMs), continues to be limited, highlighted by marked biases in model-data benchmarking exercises. Here, we leveraged the PLUMBER2 dataset of observations and model simulations of terrestrial sensible heat, latent heat, and net ecosystem exchange fluxes from 153 international eddy-covariance sites to identify the meteorological conditions under which land surface models are performing worse than independent benchmark expectations. By defining performance relative to three sophisticated out-of-sample empirical models, we generated a lower bound of performance in turbulent flux prediction that can be achieved with the input information available to the land surface models during testing at flux tower sites. We found that land surface model performance relative to empirical models is worse at edge conditions – that is, LSMs underperform in timesteps where the meteorological conditions consist of coinciding relative extreme values. Conversely, LSMs perform much better under “typical” conditions within the centre of the meteorological variable distributions. Constraining analysis to exclude the edge conditions results in the LSMs outperforming strong empirical benchmarks. Encouragingly, we show that refinement of the performance of land surface models in these edge conditions, consisting of only 12 %–31 % of all site-timesteps, would see large improvements (22 %–114 %) in an aggregated performance metric. Better performance in the edge conditions could see mean relative improvements in the aggregated metric of 77 % for the latent heat flux, 48 % for the sensible heat flux, and 36 % for the net ecosystem exchange on average across all LSMs and sites. Precise targeting of model development towards these meteorological edge conditions offers a fruitful avenue to focus model development, ensuring future improvements have the greatest impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biogeosciences
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-263-2026
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Land surface model underperformance tied to specific meteorological conditions

Craig R. Ferguson, Anna Ukkola, Gabriele Arduini, Martin G. De Kauwe et al.
Biogeosciences
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Land surface model underperformance tied to specific meteorological conditions

Craig R. Ferguson, Anna Ukkola, Gabriele Arduini, Martin G. De Kauwe, Tomoko Nitta, Keith W. Oleson, Jürgen Knauer, Nicholas Vuichard, Isaac R. Towers, Andy J. Pitman, Hyungjun Kim, Gab Abramowitz, Martin J. Best, Catherine Ottlé, Xiaoni Wang-Faivre, Jon Cranko Page, David M. Lawrence
article en

Abstract

Abstract. The exchange of carbon, water, and energy fluxes between the land and the atmosphere plays a vital role in shaping global change and extreme events. Yet our understanding of the theory of this surface-atmosphere exchange, represented via land surface models (LSMs), continues to be limited, highlighted by marked biases in model-data benchmarking exercises. Here, we leveraged the PLUMBER2 dataset of observations and model simulations of terrestrial sensible heat, latent heat, and net ecosystem exchange fluxes from 153 international eddy-covariance sites to identify the meteorological conditions under which land surface models are performing worse than independent benchmark expectations. By defining performance relative to three sophisticated out-of-sample empirical models, we generated a lower bound of performance in turbulent flux prediction that can be achieved with the input information available to the land surface models during testing at flux tower sites. We found that land surface model performance relative to empirical models is worse at edge conditions – that is, LSMs underperform in timesteps where the meteorological conditions consist of coinciding relative extreme values. Conversely, LSMs perform much better under “typical” conditions within the centre of the meteorological variable distributions. Constraining analysis to exclude the edge conditions results in the LSMs outperforming strong empirical benchmarks. Encouragingly, we show that refinement of the performance of land surface models in these edge conditions, consisting of only 12 %–31 % of all site-timesteps, would see large improvements (22 %–114 %) in an aggregated performance metric. Better performance in the edge conditions could see mean relative improvements in the aggregated metric of 77 % for the latent heat flux, 48 % for the sensible heat flux, and 36 % for the net ecosystem exchange on average across all LSMs and sites. Precise targeting of model development towards these meteorological edge conditions offers a fruitful avenue to focus model development, ensuring future improvements have the greatest impact.

BiogeosciencesVol. 23(1)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Albany State University (US), University of Technology Sydney (AU), Met Office (GB), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Bristol (GB), University at Albany, State University of New York (US), ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (AU), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Chuo University (JP)
National Science Foundation, National Computational Infrastructure, Australian Government, National Research Foundation, Korea Meteorological Administration, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, Climate Extremes, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.