Correspondence between borderline and inconclusive pre‐mortem CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and post‐mortem Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change

Abstract Background Positive CSF biomarkers have been shown to be a reliable predictor of post‐mortem Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC) and are often incorporated into clinical diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease. However, less is known about the predictive value of borderline or inconclusive results, which are not uncommon in clinical practice. The current project determined correspondence between CSF AD biomarkers and post‐mortem ADNC in a clinical research sample enriched for atypical dementia syndromes, focusing on borderline and inconclusive results. Method All participants in the Northwestern University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (NUADRC) with available CSF AD biomarker results who donated their brain at the time of death were included ( N = 74, Mean age at CSF = 64.99 [SD = 7.34], Mean years from CSF to death = 5.6 [range 1‐14 years], 43% female, 95% non‐Hispanic white; see Table 1 for breakdown of clinical syndromes and pathological diagnoses). CSF results were categorized as AD, Borderline, Inconclusive, or Not AD based on ADMark thresholds for amyloid‐b 42 /total tau index (ATI) and phosphorylated tau (pTau; Figure 1). Result Across clinical phenotypes, results consistent with AD on CSF were highly specific for High ADNC on autopsy (97%) but only moderately sensitive (68%); positive predictive value was also high (97%). Within Borderline and Inconclusive cases, abnormal ATI reliably predicted High ADNC on autopsy (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 80%), regardless of pTau results. In this sample, there were no cases with pTau in the AD range but normal ATI that had High ADNC on autopsy. Abnormal CSF ATI and/or pTau were seen in some cases of FTLD‐tau, FTLD‐TDP, and other primary neuropathologic diagnoses. Conclusion Consistent with prior findings, CSF results categorized as consistent with AD were highly specific and predictive of primary ADNC pathology on post‐mortem analysis, regardless of clinical presentation. In the setting of Borderline or inconclusive results, ATI in the AD range reliably predicted high ADNC, regardless of pTau range. These findings help clarify the prognostic utility of ATI and pTau values in Borderline and Inconclusive CSF results, which can help inform differential diagnosis between AD and other neurodegenerative etiologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_105984
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correspondence between borderline and inconclusive pre‐mortem CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and post‐mortem Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change

S. Weintraub, Tamar Gefen, David Gate, Joshua Cahan et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Correspondence between borderline and inconclusive pre‐mortem CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and post‐mortem Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change

S. Weintraub, Tamar Gefen, David Gate, Joshua Cahan, Changiz Geula, Robert J. Vassar, Allison Lapins, Nina Reiser, Marsel Mesulam, Deborah Zemlock, Molly A Mather
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Positive CSF biomarkers have been shown to be a reliable predictor of post‐mortem Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC) and are often incorporated into clinical diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease. However, less is known about the predictive value of borderline or inconclusive results, which are not uncommon in clinical practice. The current project determined correspondence between CSF AD biomarkers and post‐mortem ADNC in a clinical research sample enriched for atypical dementia syndromes, focusing on borderline and inconclusive results. Method All participants in the Northwestern University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (NUADRC) with available CSF AD biomarker results who donated their brain at the time of death were included ( N = 74, Mean age at CSF = 64.99 [SD = 7.34], Mean years from CSF to death = 5.6 [range 1‐14 years], 43% female, 95% non‐Hispanic white; see Table 1 for breakdown of clinical syndromes and pathological diagnoses). CSF results were categorized as AD, Borderline, Inconclusive, or Not AD based on ADMark thresholds for amyloid‐b 42 /total tau index (ATI) and phosphorylated tau (pTau; Figure 1). Result Across clinical phenotypes, results consistent with AD on CSF were highly specific for High ADNC on autopsy (97%) but only moderately sensitive (68%); positive predictive value was also high (97%). Within Borderline and Inconclusive cases, abnormal ATI reliably predicted High ADNC on autopsy (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 80%), regardless of pTau results. In this sample, there were no cases with pTau in the AD range but normal ATI that had High ADNC on autopsy. Abnormal CSF ATI and/or pTau were seen in some cases of FTLD‐tau, FTLD‐TDP, and other primary neuropathologic diagnoses. Conclusion Consistent with prior findings, CSF results categorized as consistent with AD were highly specific and predictive of primary ADNC pathology on post‐mortem analysis, regardless of clinical presentation. In the setting of Borderline or inconclusive results, ATI in the AD range reliably predicted high ADNC, regardless of pTau range. These findings help clarify the prognostic utility of ATI and pTau values in Borderline and Inconclusive CSF results, which can help inform differential diagnosis between AD and other neurodegenerative etiologies.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Northwestern University (US), National Institute on Drug Abuse (US), Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.