Climate change and population growth: A reassessment

It is widely believed that population growth has a negative impact on global warming. Here, we set set up an integrated assessment model (a simplified DICE model) and derive analytically a condition for which a higher world population causally leads to lower long-run temperature increase under optimal carbon taxation. The condition is easily fulfilled for standard IAM parameters and independent from the discount rate, the degree of utilitarianism in the objective function, the calibration of the emission and abatement technologies, and other economic parameters. We also show that at the steady state, a larger population implies higher social and individual welfare. We also investigate a refinement of the DICE approach that could mitigate or reverse the predicted negative effect of population growth on climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2026.103282
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate change and population growth: A reassessment

Holger Strulik, Timo Trimborn
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Climate change and population growth: A reassessment

Holger Strulik, Timo Trimborn
article en

Abstract

It is widely believed that population growth has a negative impact on global warming. Here, we set set up an integrated assessment model (a simplified DICE model) and derive analytically a condition for which a higher world population causally leads to lower long-run temperature increase under optimal carbon taxation. The condition is easily fulfilled for standard IAM parameters and independent from the discount rate, the degree of utilitarianism in the objective function, the calibration of the emission and abatement technologies, and other economic parameters. We also show that at the steady state, a larger population implies higher social and individual welfare. We also investigate a refinement of the DICE approach that could mitigate or reverse the predicted negative effect of population growth on climate change.

Journal of Environmental Economics and ManagementVol. 137
Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Aarhus Business College (DK), University of Göttingen (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Climate change and population growth: A reassessment — Holger Strulik, Timo Trimborn · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS