Bridging Anthropology and Global History: Comparative Approaches to the Social-Class/Education Nexus in Nepal

In recent years, the field of comparative education has boldly turned inward, investigating and questioning its own historical and philosophical foundations. By challenging the discipline’s dependence on positivistic, modern modes of comparison, space has emerged for rethinking methodological approaches more broadly. Extending this line of research, this article links modes of comparison from the discipline of anthropology and global history to the interdisciplinary field of comparative education. Drawing on a rereading and writing across the authors’ previous historical and ethnographic research in Nepal, this article explores the social-class/education nexus through a multilayered comparative approach. Accordingly, the article points to the comparative dynamics inherent to sociocultural processes of education in Nepal related to the concept of development (bikas). In doing so, the article argues for a comparative approach operating at different analytical levels—historical, ethnographic, and reflexive—that move beyond the comparative episteme of modernity still predominant in the field.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Education Review
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/739178
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging Anthropology and Global History: Comparative Approaches to the Social-Class/Education Nexus in Nepal

Todd John Wallenius, Karen Valentin
Comparative Education Review
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

Bridging Anthropology and Global History: Comparative Approaches to the Social-Class/Education Nexus in Nepal

Todd John Wallenius, Karen Valentin
article en

Abstract

In recent years, the field of comparative education has boldly turned inward, investigating and questioning its own historical and philosophical foundations. By challenging the discipline’s dependence on positivistic, modern modes of comparison, space has emerged for rethinking methodological approaches more broadly. Extending this line of research, this article links modes of comparison from the discipline of anthropology and global history to the interdisciplinary field of comparative education. Drawing on a rereading and writing across the authors’ previous historical and ethnographic research in Nepal, this article explores the social-class/education nexus through a multilayered comparative approach. Accordingly, the article points to the comparative dynamics inherent to sociocultural processes of education in Nepal related to the concept of development (bikas). In doing so, the article argues for a comparative approach operating at different analytical levels—historical, ethnographic, and reflexive—that move beyond the comparative episteme of modernity still predominant in the field.

Comparative Education ReviewVol. 70(1)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging Anthropology and Global History: Comparative Approaches to the Social-Class/Education Nexus in Nepal — Todd John Wallenius, Karen Valentin · Comparative Education Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS